Table 3.
Interoception, proprioception and bodily changes during pregnancy
| Non-autistic group | Autistic group | aOR (95% CI) | p-value | p-value (FDR adjusted) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you notice any changes since becoming pregnant in your interoception? | 3.87 (2.69–5.56) | < 0.001 | - | ||
| N | 523 | 417 | |||
| Yes | 218 (42%) | 286 (69%) | |||
| No | 305 (58%) | 131 (31%) | |||
| Did you notice any changes since becoming pregnant in your proprioception? | 3.97 (2.70–5.85) | < 0.001 | - | ||
| N | 523 | 416 | |||
| Yes | 81 (15%) | 158 (38%) | |||
| No | 442 (85%) | 258 (62%) | |||
| I found it very difficult to adjust to the changes my body went thougha | 2.87 (2.15–3.84) | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | ||
| N | 524 | 413 | |||
| Agree | 165 (31%) | 223 (54%) | |||
| Disagree | 335 (64%) | 167 (40%) | |||
| Don’t know | 5 (1%) | 10 (2%) | |||
| Not applicable | 19 (4%) | 13 (3%) |
Notes. Multivariate binary logistic regression performed; FDR = false discovery rate
aItem analysed with individual logistic regression due to weakly correlating with other items