TABLE 6.
Changes in muscle fitness of obese college students before and after the experiment.
| Target | CON group | RT group | BFRT group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Post 12 weeks | Baseline | Post 12 weeks | Baseline | Post 12 weeks | |
| Knee extensor isometric PT(Nm) | 171.00 ± 45.11 | 161.38 ± 34.47 | 174.08 ± 46.58 | 174.22 ± 33.95 | 172.03 ± 34.91 | 217.96 ± 24.52**aabb |
| Elbow flexor isometric PT(Nm) | 40.83 ± 11.23 | 37.65 ± 7.72 | 42.28 ± 13.25 | 47.01 ± 8.58 | 49.02 ± 8.78 | 65.57 ± 15.28**aabb |
| Knee 180°extensor PP(W) | 279.40 ± 77.00 | 248.74 ± 59.19 | 292.06 ± 98.51 | 286.51 ± 84.69 | 349.36 ± 57.22 | 449.91 ± 89.03**aabb |
| Elbow 180°flexor PP(W) | 53.30 ± 19.46 | 52.44 ± 22.60 | 56.63 ± 17.67 | 56.40 ± 15.31 | 65.61 ± 25.76 | 88.87 ± 31.64**aabb |
| Knee 180°extensor endurance ratio (ER) (%) | 73.50 ± 6.87 | 71.00 ± 6.70 | 76.33 ± 5.61 | 84.11 ± 3.62**dd | 75.67 ± 4.98 | 90.44 ± 5.55**aab |
| Elbow 180°flexor endurance ratio (ER) (%) | 68.13 ± 9.88 | 66.63 ± 6.84 | 69.89 ± 6.85 | 77.56 ± 6.39**dd | 72.33 ± 7.94 | 82.00 ± 9.17**aa |
*denotes the comparison between the pre and post-experimental groups themselves, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
arepresents the between-group comparison between the post-experiment group and the CON, group. a p < 0.05, aa p < 0.01.
bdepicts the post-experiment between-group comparison and RT. b p < 0.05, bb p < 0.01.