Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 3;14:1289109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289109

Table 2.

Hierarchical general linear model (SS1) examining the influence (expressed as a semi-partial regression coefficient [sr]) of BGR, age, parental EA, and social class on participant EA.

Predictors Sr 95% CI F-value Df1/Df2 Value of p
Biogeographic region 0.35 0.34, 0.36 1856.87 7/69081 <0.0001
Age −0.18 −0.19, −0.17 3257.93 1/69081 <0.0001
Parental EA 0.42 0.41, 0.43 18953.24 1/69081 <0.0001
Social class 0.07 0.06, 0.08 508.98 1/69081 <0.0001
Set 1
Biogeographic region*Age 0.08 0.07, 0.09 98.26 7/69081 <0.0001
Set 2
Biogeographic region*Parental EA 0.06 0.05, 0.07 52.62 7/69081 <0.0001
Set 3
Biogeographic region*Social class 0.03 0.02, 0.04 15.61 7/69081 <0.0001
Age*Parental EA 0.00 −0.01, 0.01 0.00 1/69081 0.9000
Age*Social class 0.01 0.00, 0.02 8.26 1/69081 0.0040
Parental EA *Social class −0.04 −0.05,− 0.03 140.97 1/69081 <0.0001
Multiple R 0.59 0.59, 0.59 1089.23 34/69081 <0.0001

The model also estimated the influence of the following interaction sets: region by age, region by EA, and region by social class, in addition to age by parental EA, age by social class, and finally, parental EA by social class.