Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 16;14:1417. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51962-3

Table 4.

Linear regression on relationship of alcohol consumption and score of the Composite Physical Performance Scale (CPPS), by sex.

Men (N = 1759) Women (N = 2456)
Non-drinking Non-problem drinking Hazardous drinking Harmful drinking Non-drinking Non-problem drinking Hazardous drinking Harmful drinking
B (95%CI) B (95%CI)
Model 1a − 0.90 (− 1.24; − 0.57) Ref − 0.27 (− 0.54; − 0.01) − 1.19 (− 1.59; − 0.79) − 0.42 (− 0.70; − 0.13) Ref 0.16 (− 0.23; 0.55) − 2.05 (− 3.24; − 0.87)
Model 2b − 0.71 (− 1.04; − 0.38) Ref − 0.20 (− 0.46; 0.06) − 0.98 (− 1.37; − 0.58) − 0.37 (− 0.65; − 0.09) Ref 0.26 (− 0.13; 0.65) − 1.79 (− 2.97; − 0.61)
Model 3c − 0.70 (− 1.02; − 0.37) Ref − 0.13 (− 0.39; 0.13) − 0.83 (− 1.23; − 0.43) − 0.36 (− 0.64; − 0.08) Ref 0.37 (− 0.02; 0.77) − 1.54 (− 2.3; − 0.36)
Model 4d − 0.67 (− 1.00; − 0.34) Ref − 0.14 (− 0.40; 0.13) − 0.75 (− 1.15; − 0.35) − 0.38 (− 0.67; − 0.09) Ref 0.35 (− 0.05; 0.75) − 1.59 (− 2.78; − 0.41)
Model 5e − 0.65 (− 0.98; − 0.32) Ref − 0.12 (− 0.39; 0.14) − 0.73 (− 1.13; − 0.33) − 0.36 (− 0.65; − 0.08) Ref 0.37 (− 0.03; 0.76) − 1.53 (− 2.71; − 0.34)

Significant coefficients are marked in bold.

aModel 1 was adjusted for age, height, and city of residence.

bModel 2 was adjusted as per Model 1 plus education level.

cModel 3 was adjusted as per Model 2 plus smoking status.

dModel 4 was adjusted as per Model 3 plus BMI, diet quality, physical activity.

eModel 5 was adjusted as per Model 4 plus the presence of chronic diseases.