Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 13;35(1):e29. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e29

Table 1. Main studies comparing sentinel node mapping vs. lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer endometrial cancer.

Author Patients Study arms Oncologic outcomes
Zammarrelli et al. [6] 199 uterine carcinosarcoma 99 SNM 3-yrs PFS: 62.9%; OS: 72.1%
100 LND 3-yrs PFS: 52.3%; OS: 71.6%
Schlappe et al. [36] 176 deep invasive endometrioid EC patients 82 SNM 3-yrs PFS: 78.7%; OS: 91.8%
94 LND 3-yrs PFS: 77.7%; OS: 77.6%
Schlappe et al. [29] 214 serous and clear cell EC patients 118 SNM 3-yrs PFS: 69%; OS: 88%
96 LND 3-yrs PFS: 80%; OS: 77%
Bogani et al. [30] 100 high-risk EC patients 50 SNM PFS: 84%; OS: 88% at 16 mo
50 SNM plus LND PFS: 88%; OS: 88% at 18 mo
Holtzman et al. [37] 189 high-risk EC patients 46 SNM 3-yrs PFS: 71.1%; OS: 81.1%
143 LND 3-yrs PFS: 71.3%; OS: 95.1%

SNM, sentinel node mapping; LND, lymphadenectomy; PFS, progression-free survival; OS, overall survival.