Table 3. Evolution of second line treatment for recurrent cervical cancer.
| First line therapy | Second line therapy | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOG-204 | GOG-240 | Keynote-826 | EMPOWER | Innova TV 301 | |
| Treatment | CDDP+Paclitaxel | Doublet+ Bevacizumab | ChemoRx+Pembrolizumab with or without Bevacizumab | Cemiplimab | Tisotumab Vedotin |
| Median OS | 12.0 mo | 17.0 mo, HR 0.71 | 24.4 mo, HR 0.64 | 12.0 mo, HR 0.69 | 11.5 mo, HR 0.70 |
| ORR | 29.1% | 48.0% | 68.1% in PD-L1+≥1% | 18.0% in PD-L1+≥1% | 17.8% |
| Citation | Monk BJ, et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4649-55. | Tewari KS, et al. N Engl J Med 2014;370:734-43. | Colombo N, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;385:1856-67. | Tewari KS, et al. N Engl J Med 2022;386:544-55. | Vergote I, et al. ESMO 2023 LBA#9, NCT04697628. |
CDDP, cisplatin; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1.