Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken). 2023 Sep 21;47(11):2081–2089. doi: 10.1111/acer.15189

Table 3.

 Mean Comparisons of eBAC and Consequences by Drinking Intensity across Different Time Constraints

Time Constraints
None <2 Hrs <4 Hrs
Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N Mean (SD) N
eBAC
Moderate 0.05 (0.03) 1101 0.05 (0.03) 768 0.05 (0.03) 1054
Binge 0.16 (0.05) 611 0.17 (0.05) 90 0.16 (0.05) 419
HID 0.30 (0.07) 211 0.34 (0.06) 8 0.31 (0.07) 75
P-value <.001 <.001 <.001
# of Negative Consequences
Moderate 0.14 (0.50) 1110 0.10 (0.41) 770 0.13 (0.48) 1056
Binge 0.85 (1.31) 617 0.90 (1.68) 90 0.82 (1.30) 422
HID 1.73 (1.86) 211 0.63 (0.74) 8 1.87 (1.98) 75
P-value <.001 <.001 <.001

Note. Data are from drinking days only. Non-drinking days are not included. Time constraints applied to all drinking levels. All groups were significantly different from each other in pair-wise comparisons, except HID did not signficantly differ from moderate and binge for negative consequences with the <2 hrs. limit.