Skip to main content
. 2023 Dec 20;10(1):e23920. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23920

Table 4.

Design matrix with response values based on the FFD experiments.

Exp. no Input parameters
Responses
A (mm) B C D YS (MPa) UTS (MPa) UE (%)
1 1 1 1 1 285 301 24.36
2 1 1 1 2 282 330 26.03
3 1 1 1 3 288 340 28.62
4 1 1 2 1 274 326 24.43
5 1 1 2 2 271 328 26.90
6 1 1 2 3 276 328 28.64
7 1 1 3 1 281 330 26.07
8 1 1 3 2 287 334 27.75
9 1 1 3 3 283 340 27.77
10 1 2 1 1 281 330 24.36
11 1 2 1 2 282 336 26.92
12 1 2 1 3 275 326 26.94
13 1 2 2 1 269 325 25.24
14 1 2 2 2 266 327 26.86
15 1 2 2 3 274 331 27.75
16 1 2 3 1 274 329 25.24
17 1 2 3 2 286 337 27.75
18 1 2 3 3 280 341 28.62
19 3 1 1 1 270 287 7.27
20 3 1 1 2 275 291 5.55
21 3 1 1 3 284 313 13.25
22 3 1 2 1 258 290 8.14
23 3 1 2 2 260 290 8.13
24 3 1 2 3 262 298 14.98
25 3 1 3 1 245 286 10.71
26 3 1 3 2 254 285 8.99
27 3 1 3 3 257 293 14.12
28 3 2 1 1 268 283 6.44
29 3 2 1 2 269 284 6.44
30 3 2 1 3 282 289 12.40
31 3 2 2 1 254 282 8.99
32 3 2 2 2 253 287 9.76
33 3 2 2 3 261 294 14.10
34 3 2 3 1 240 278 11.53
35 3 2 3 2 251 282 9.84
36 3 2 3 3 253 295 17.52