TABLE 3.
Results of survival analysis models for the relationship between each dietary pattern score and all-cause mortality
| Population | Case, No. | Incidence Rate, per 1000 person-years | HR (95% CI) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||
| PDI | ||||||
| Q1 | 599 | 410.00 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 553 | 383.72 | 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) | 0.93 (0.83, 1.05) | 0.93 (0.82, 1.05) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.02) |
| Q3 | 486 | 380.26 | 0.93 (0.82, 1.04) | 0.93 (0.82, 1.04) | 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) | 0.88 (0.77, 1.00) |
| Q4 | 425 | 361.35 | 0.87 (0.77, 0.99)1 | 0.87 (0.77, 0.99)1 | 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) | 0.87 (0.76, 1.00)1 |
| Q5 | 422 | 338.36 | 0.81 (0.72, 0.92)2 | 0.82 (0.72, 0.92)2 | 0.83 (0.73, 0.94)2 | 0.81 (0.71, 0.90)2 |
| hPDI | ||||||
| Q1 | 613 | 418.29 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 478 | 394.20 | 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) | 0.94 (0.83, 1.06) | 0.92 (0.81, 1.04) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.02) |
| Q3 | 513 | 368.61 | 0.87 (0.78, 0.98)1 | 0.87 (0.77, 0.98)1 | 0.84 (0.75, 0.95)2 | 0.82 (0.73, 0.93)2 |
| Q4 | 447 | 343.06 | 0.81 (0.72, 0.92)2 | 0.81 (0.71, 0.91)2 | 0.80 (0.70, 0.91)3 | 0.78 (0.68, 0.89)3 |
| Q5 | 434 | 352.70 | 0.83 (0.74, 0.94)2 | 0.83 (0.73, 0.94)2 | 0.81 (0.72, 0.93)2 | 0.79 (0.69, 0.93)2 |
| uPDI | ||||||
| Q1 | 521 | 365.80 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 573 | 367.59 | 1.00 (0.89, 1.13) | 1.00 (0.87, 1.13) | 0.97 (0.86, 1.10) | 0.97 (0.85, 1.10) |
| Q3 | 478 | 370.73 | 1.02 (0.90, 1.15) | 1.01 (0.89, 1.15) | 1.03 (0.90, 1.18) | 1.03 (0.90, 1.17) |
| Q4 | 501 | 386.72 | 1.06 (0.94, 1.20) | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) | 1.07 (0.94, 1.22) | 1.08 (0.94, 1.23) |
| Q5 | 412 | 397.89 | 1.10 (0.96, 1.25) | 1.09 (0.96, 1.25) | 1.09 (0.95, 1.26) | 1.10 (0.95, 1.27) |
| HPF | ||||||
| Q1 | 521 | 410.30 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 530 | 373.83 | 0.90 (0.80, 1.02) | 0.89 (0.79, 1.00) | 0.87 (0.77, 0.99)1 | 0.86 (0.75, 0.98)1 |
| Q3 | 608 | 379.82 | 0.92 (0.82, 1.03) | 0.91 (0.81, 1.02) | 0.88 (0.79, 1.00) | 0.87 (0.76, 0.99)1 |
| Q4 | 472 | 374.20 | 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) | 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) | 0.89 (0.78, 1.02) | 0.87 (0.75, 0.99)1 |
| Q5 | 354 | 335.98 | 0.81 (0.71, 0.92)2 | 0.80 (0.70, 0.92)2 | 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)2 | 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)2 |
| uHPF | ||||||
| Q1 | 510 | 399.86 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 513 | 354.16 | 0.87 (0.77, 0.99)1 | 0.88 (0.78, 1.00)1 | 0.88 (0.77, 1.00)1 | 0.89 (0.78, 1.01) |
| Q3 | 910 | 388.98 | 0.97 (0.87, 1.08) | 0.98 (0.88, 1.09) | 0.99 (0.88, 1.11) | 1.00 (0.89, 1.13) |
| Q4 | 177 | 348.21 | 0.86 (0.73, 1.02) | 0.86 (0.73, 1.03) | 0.89 (0.75, 1.06) | 0.89 (0.75, 1.07) |
| Q5 | 375 | 363.47 | 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) | 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) | 0.95 (0.82, 1.10) |
| AF | ||||||
| Q1 | 510 | 376.42 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | 659 | 355.58 | 0.94 (0.84, 1.06) | 0.94 (0.84, 1.05) | 0.92 (0.82, 1.04) | 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) |
| Q3 | 515 | 361.06 | 0.96 (0.85, 1.08) | 0.96 (0.85, 1.09) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.08) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.09) |
| Q4 | 448 | 402.01 | 1.07 (0.94, 1.22) | 1.07 (0.94, 1.22) | 1.07 (0.94, 1.23) | 1.08 (0.94, 1.24) |
| Q5 | 353 | 413.14 | 1.10 (0.96, 1.26) | 1.11 (0.97, 1.27) | 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) | 1.17 (1.00, 1.36)∗ |
model 1: unadjusted; model 2: adjusted for age and gender; model 3: adjusted for age, gender, residence, ethnic group, BMI, years of schooling, marital status, income status, current smoker, current alcohol drinker and regular exercise; model 4: adjusted for age, gender, residence, ethnic group, BMI, years of schooling, marital status, income status, current smoker, current alcohol drinker, regular exercise, and number of chronic diseases.
Abbreviations: PDI, overall plant-based diet index; hPDI, healthy plant-based diet index; uPDI, unhealthy plant-based diet index; HPF, healthy plant foods index; uHPF, unhealthy foods index; AF, animal foods index; Ref., Reference.
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001.