Table 5.
CALL 1 (168) |
CALL 2 (136) |
CALL 3 (120) |
CALL 4 (96) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Use | * | ||||
Good | 42.3% (71) | 44.9% (61) | 49.2% (59) | 41.7% (40) | |
Moderate | 31% (52) | 20.6% (28) | 17.5% (42) | 6.3% (6) | |
Poor | 26.8% (45) | 34.6% (47) | 33.3% (32) | 52.1% (50) | |
Hydratationa | Good | 71.48% (90) | 65.5% (76) | 72.1% (98) | 71.6% (68) |
Poor | 28.6% (36) | 34.5% (40) | 27.9% (38) | 28.4% (27) | |
Consumption | * | ||||
Good | 46.4% (62) | 56.6% (77) | 45.8% (55) | 55.2% (53) | |
Moderate | 16.7% (28) | 12.5% (17) | 21.7% (26) | 16.7% (16) | |
Poor | 36.9% (78) | 30.9% (42) | 32.5% (39) | 28.1% (27) | |
Implementation | * | ||||
Good | 50% (84) | 40.4% (55) | 48.3% (58) | 55.2% (53) | |
Moderate | 20.2% (34) | 27.2% (37) | 14.2% (17) | 6.3% (6) | |
Poor | 29.8% (50) | 32.4% (44) | 37.5% (45) | 38.5% (37) |
*Comparison with Call 1: p < 0.01
aData obtained in 75% of sample