Table 6.
CALL 1 (168) |
CALL 2 (136) |
CALL 3 (120) |
CALL 4 (96) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H (80) |
NH (88) |
H (68) |
NH (68) |
H (59) |
NH (61) |
H (45) |
NH (51) |
||
USE | G | 43.8% (35) | 40.9% (36) | 51.5% (35) | 26.5% (18) | 52.5% (31) | 45.9% (28) | 66.7% (30) | 39.2% (20) |
M | 18.8% (15) | 42% (37) | 5.9% (4) | 35.3% (24) | 22% (13) | 13.1% (8) | 4.4% (2) | 7.8% (4) | |
P | 37.5% (30) | 17% (15) | 42.6% (29) | 38.2% (26) | 25.4% (15) | 41% (25) | 28.9% (13) | 52.9% (27) | |
p < 0.05 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.001 | p < 0.02 | ||||||
HYDa | G | 65.6% (42) | 37.4% (48) | 70.4% (28) | 61.3% (78) | 80.9% (38) | 70.93% (39) | 72.7% (32) | 70.6% (36) |
B | 34.4% (22) | 22.6% (14) | 29.6% (16) | 38.7% (24) | 19.1% (9) | 29.1% (16) | 27.3% (12) | 29.4% (15) | |
NS | NS | NS | NS | ||||||
CON | G | 37.5% (30) | 54.5% (48) | 25% (17) | 48.5% (33) | 44.1% (26) | 47.4% (29) | 66.7% (30) | 47.1% (24) |
M | 16.3% (13) | 17% (15) | 20–6% (14) | 22.1% (15) | 16.9% (10) | 26.2% (16) | 6.7% (3) | 23.5% (12) | |
P | 46.3% (37) | 28.4% (25) | 54.4% (37) | 29.4% (20) | 39% (23) | 26.2% (16) | 26.7% (12) | 29.4% (15) | |
p < 0.05 | p < 0.01 | NS | p < 0.05 | ||||||
IMP | G | 37.5% (30) | 58% (51) | 36.8% (25) | 26.5% (18) | 47.5% (28) | 49.2% (30) | 57.8% (32) | 56.8% (21) |
M | 21.3% (17) | 19.3% (17) | 19.1% (13) | 27.9% (19) | 18.6% (11) | 9.8% (6) | 0% (0) | 6% (6) | |
P | 41.3% (33) | 22.7% (20) | 44.1% (30) | 45.6% (31) | 33.9% (20) | 41% (25) | 24.4% (13) | 17.6% (24) | |
NS | NS | NS | p < 0.01 |
HYD hydration, CON consumption, IMP implementation, G good, M moderate, P poor
aData obtained in 75% of sample