Table 5.
Linear regression analysis for association of insulin resistance indices in 2 genotype groups in 3 models. P values less than 0.05 are shown in bold
| HOMA-IR | ||||||
| Data | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| BsmI (rs1544410) | ||||||
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | -0.033 (-0.228, 0.136) | 0.620 | -0.026 (-0.212, 0.141) | 0.694 | -0.036 (-0.226, 0.127) | 0.581 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | -0.111 (-0.420, 0.035) | 0.097 | -0.116 (-0.421, 0.020) | 0.074 | -0.129 (-0.448, -0.004) | 0.046 |
| FIRI | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | 0.001 (-0.151, 0.153) | 0.992 | 0.009 (-0.136, 0.158) | 0.884 | -0.006 (-0.154, 0.139) | 0.921 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | -0.125 (-0.378, -0.002) | 0.048 | -0.132 (-0.383, -0.018) | 0.031 | -0.148 (-0.409, -0.045) | 0.015 |
| Insulin-to-glucose ratio | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | -0.023 (-0.343, 0.235) | 0.713 | -0.019 (-0.333, 0.243) | 0.756 | -0.041 (-0.380, 0.185) | 0.497 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | -0.134 (-0.377, -0.019) | 0.031 | -0.137 (-0.381, -0.024) | 0.026 | -0.153 (-0.404, -0.053) | 0.011 |
| QUICKI | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | 0.021 (-0.005, 0.007) | 0.746 | 0.015 (-0.005, 0.006) | 0.813 | 0.028 (-0.004, 0.007) | 0.661 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | 0.096 (-0.002, 0.012) | 0.135 | 0.100 (-0.001, 0.013) | 0.111 | 0.113 (-0.001, 0.013) | 0.071 |
| Bennett’s index | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | 0.066 (-0.103, 0.341) | 0.293 | 0.068 (-0.101, 0.344) | 0.283 | 0.073 (-0.093, 0.356) | 0.251 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | 0.036 (-0.199, 0.359) | 0.573 | 0.034 (-0.202, 0.356) | 0.585 | 0.037 (-0.199 ,0.366) | 0.561 |
| McAuley | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | 0.095 (-0.025, 0.181) | 0.136 | 0.093 (-0.026, 0.179) | 0.145 | 0.114 (-0.008, 0.194) | 0.070 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | 0.041 (-0.087, 0.171) | 0.525 | 0.043 (-0.086, 0.173) | 0.506 | 0.051 (-0.075, 0.181) | 0.414 |
| Revised McAuley | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
| OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | OR (CI 95%) | p value | |
| Dominant (BB + Bb) Vs bb | 0.085 (-0.037, 0.196) | 0.179 | 0.083 (-0.039, 0.194) | 0.189 | 0.111 (-0.007, 0.214) | 0.067 |
| Recessive (Bb + bb) Vs BB | 0.030 (-0.112, 0.183) | 0.634 | 0.033 (-0.109, 0.186) | 0.608 | 0.051 (-0.081, 0.200) | 0.403 |