Table 3.
Participant perceptions of amount of information and satisfaction with eICs
| Variable, eIC approach | Response | Participant assignmenta | Total (n = 24) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced eIC first (n = 12) n (%) |
Text-only eIC first (n = 12) n (%) |
|||
| Perception of amount of information in eIC | ||||
| Text-only eIC | Just right | 10 (83.3) | 9 (75.0) | 19 (79.2) |
| Not enough | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Too much | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25.0) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Enhanced eIC | Just right | 9 (75.0) | 10 (83.3) | 19 (79.2) |
| Not enough | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Too much | 3 (25.0) | 2 (16.7) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Satisfaction with eIC | ||||
| Text-only eIC | Very satisfied | 9 (75.0) | 9 (75.0) | 18 (75.0) |
| Pretty satisfied | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25.0) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Pretty unsatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Very unsatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Not sure | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (4.2) | |
| Enhanced eIC | Very satisfied | 8 (66.7) | 10 (83.3) | 18 (75.0) |
| Pretty satisfied | 4 (33.3) | 1 (8.3) | 5 (20.8) | |
| Pretty unsatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (4.2) | |
| Very unsatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Not sure | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
eIC electronic informed consent
aSome totals do not equal 100% due to rounding