. 2024 Jan 17;24:101. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03847-6

Table 2.

Frequencies and percentages of marginal integrity scores in both groups

Follow-up	Marginal integrity		Nano composite	Emax	p-value
Baseline	Alpha-1	n	25	25	1ns
	Alpha-1	%	100.0%	100.0%
	Alpha-2	n	0	0
	Alpha-2	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Alpha-3	n	0	0
	Alpha-3	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 1	n	0	0
	Bravo 1	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 2	n	0	0
	Bravo 2	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Delta	n	0	0
	Delta	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Dropout	n	0	0
	Dropout	%	0.0%	0.0%
6 months	Alpha-1	n	25	20	0.021*
	Alpha-1	%	100.0%	80.0%
	Alpha-2	n	0	0
	Alpha-2	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Alpha-3	n	0	5
	Alpha-3	%	0.0%	20.0%
	Bravo 1	n	0	0
	Bravo 1	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 2	n	0	0
	Bravo 2	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Delta	n	0	0
	Delta	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Dropout	n	0	0
	Dropout	%	0.0%	0.0%
1 year	Alpha-1	n	21	17	0.150ns
	Alpha-1	%	84.0%	68.0%
	Alpha-2	n	2	0
	Alpha-2	%	8.0%	0.0%
	Alpha-3	n	0	0
	Alpha-3	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 1	n	0	1
	Bravo 1	%	0.0%	4.0%
	Bravo 2	n	0	3
	Bravo 2	%	0.0%	12.0%
	Delta	n	0	1
	Delta	%	0.0%	4.0%
	Dropout	n	2	3
	Dropout	%	8.0%	12.0%
2 years	Alpha-1	n	21	17	0.150ns
	Alpha-1	%	84.0%	68.0%
	Alpha-2	n	0	0
	Alpha-2	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Alpha-3	n	2	0
	Alpha-3	%	8.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 1	n	0	0
	Bravo 1	%	0.0%	0.0%
	Bravo 2	n	0	4
	Bravo 2	%	0.0%	16.0%
	Delta	n	0	1
	Delta	%	0.0%	4.0%
	Dropout	n	2	3
	Dropout	%	8.0%	12.0%
p -value			1ns	1ns

Values with different superscript letters within the same vertical column are significantly different *; significant (p ≤ 0.05) ns; non-significant (p > 0.05)a