Table 4.

Frequencies and percentages of restoration fracture scores in both groups

Follow-up	Restoration fracture		Nano composite	Emax	p -value
Baseline	Alpha	n	25	25	1ns
		%	100.0%	100.0%
	Bravo	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Charlie	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Delta	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Dropout	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
6 months	Alpha	n	25	25	1ns
		%	100.0%	100.0%
	Bravo	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Charlie	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Delta	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Dropout	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
1 year	Alpha	n	23	20	0.152ns
		%	92.0%	80.0%
	Bravo	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Charlie	n	0	2
		%	0.0%	8.0%
	Delta	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Dropout	n	2	3
		%	8.0%	12.0%
2 years	Alpha	n	22	20	0.512ns
		%	88.0%	80.0%
	Bravo	n	1	0
		%	4.0%	0.0%
	Charlie	n	0	0
		%	0.0%	0.0%
	Delta	n	0	2
		%	0.0%	8.0%
	Dropout	n	2	3
		%	8.0%	12.0%
p -value			1ns	1ns

Values with different superscript letters within the same vertical column are significantly different *; significant (p ≤ 0.05) ns; non-significant (p > 0.05)