Table 4:
3D density map result comparison for EMPIAR 10205 and EMPIAR 10193. Bold fonts highlight the resolution of the best of the three trials for each method.
| EMPIAR 10205 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3D Density Map Statistics (Topaz) | 3D Density Map Statistics (CryoVirusDB) | |||||
| Number of Picked Particles | 155,953 | 81,037 | ||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 |
| 6.97 | 6.59 | 6.48 | 4.34 | 4.40 | 4.47 | |
| No Mask Resolution (Å) | 9.3 | 9.5 | 9.2 | 7.9 | 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Loose Mask Resolution (Å) | 7.7 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 7.1 | 6.3 |
| Tight Mask Resolution (Å) | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Corrected Mask Resolution (Å) | 7 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| EMPAIR 10193 | ||||||
| 3D Density Map Statistics (Topaz) | 3D Density Map Statistics (CryoVirusDB) | |||||
| Number of Picked Particles | 239,852 | 96,126 | ||||
| GSFSC Resolution (Å) | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 | Trial 1 | Trial 2 | Trial 3 |
| 5.86 | 5.74 | 5.82 | 5.16 | 5.22 | 5.18 | |
| No Mask Resolution (Å) | 12 | 13 | 11 | 12 | 9.4 | 9.1 |
| Loose Mask Resolution (Å) | 5.9 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 5.8 | 5.5 |
| Tight Mask Resolution (Å) | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.7 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Corrected Mask Resolution (Å) | 5.9 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 5.2 | 5.2 | 5.3 |