Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 4;110(1):306–314. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000811

Table 2.

Postoperative outcomes according to the type of surgery after propensity score matching.

No. (%)
1st PSM for primary analysis (n = 51, 1 patient was lost to follow-up) 2nd PSM for sensitivity analysis (n = 61, 3 patients were lost to follow-up)
Variable MRgLITT (n = 26) OS (n = 25) P value Strength of association MRgLITT (n = 32) OS (n = 29) P value Strength of association
Memory function
 Worse 8 (30.8) 11 (44.0) 0.95 Kendall’s tau-c = −0.04, P = 0.77 9 (28.1) 10 (34.5) 0.63 Kendall’s tau-c = −0.04, P = 0.75
 No change 17 (65.4) 10 (40.0) 21 (65.6) 13 (44.8)
 Better 1 (3.8) 4 (16.0) 2 (6.3) 6 (20.7)
Seizure freedom (yes) 20 (76.9) 19 (76.0) 0.94 Phi = 0.01, P = 0.94 23 (71.9) 23 (79.3) 0.50 Phi = −0.09, P = 0.50
Seizure frequency reduction, median (IQR) 100.0 (0.0) 100.0 (0.6) 0.86 / 100.0 (2.6) 100.0 (0.0) 0.44 /
ILAE outcome scale
 1 20 (76.9) 19 (76.0) 0.96 Kendall’s tau-c = 0.00, P = 1.00 23 (71.9) 23 (79.3) 0.63 Kendall’s tau-c = −0.07, P = 0.52
 2 1 (3.8) 0 3 (9.4) 0
 3 1 (3.8) 3 (12.0) 1 (3.1) 3 (10.3)
 4 3 (11.5) 3 (12.0) 4 (12.5) 3 (10.3)
 5 1 (3.8) 0 1 (3.1) 0
 6 0 0 0 0

ILAE, International League Against Epilepsy; IQR, interquartile range; MRgLITT, magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy; OS, open surgery; PSM, propensity score matching.