Table 7. Moderations by school type.
| T1 Personality Predicting T2 Belonging | T2 Personality Predicting T2 Belonging | |
|---|---|---|
| Extraversion | .115*** (.029) | .142*** (.018) |
| Neuroticism | -.046 (.030) | -.101*** (.019) |
| Agreeableness | .179*** (.036) | .171*** (.021) |
| Conscientiousness | .006 (.037) | .038 (.022) |
| Openness | .005 (.032) | .015 (.019) |
| Large Schools | .187 (.368) | -.437 (.062) |
| Extraversion x Large Schools | -.030 (.042) | .062* (.029) |
| Neuroticism x Large Schools | -.034 (.043) | .052 (.030) |
| Agreeableness x Large Schools | -.057 (0.052) | -.022 (0.035) |
| Conscientiousness x Large Schools | .084 (.053) | .034 (.037) |
| Openness x Large Schools | .003 (.045) | .025 (.032) |
| N Observations | 2,137 | 4,262 |
Standard errors in parentheses. The reference category is White, continuing-generation women in the control condition. To economize on space, we do not report the dummy variables for each school. Each column reports the results from separate, covariate-adjusted, regressions where “Large Schools” indicator is interacted with each of the personality dimensions to predict T2 Belonging.
*p < .05.
**p < .01.
***p < .001.