TABLE 1.
Trial | No. of patients (stage) | Regimen | Median DFS (months) (HR; 95% CI) | Median OS (months) (HR; 95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
IMpower010 [8] |
413 (IIIA) | CT → atezolizumab vs. BSC × 1 year |
Stage IIIA with PD‐L1 ≥ 1%: 42.3 vs. 26.7 (HR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.42‐0.90); Stage IIIA: 32.3 vs. 29.7 (HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.61‐1.06) |
Stage IIIA with PD‐L1 ≥ 1%: NA (HR = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.44‐1.15); Stage IIIA with PD‐L1 ≥ 50%: NA (HR = 0.30; 95% CI = 0.12‐0.74) |
PEARLS/KEYNOTE‐ 091 [10] |
177 (IIIA) | CT (optional) → Pembrolizumab vs. placebo × 1 year | NR (HR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.69‐1.24) | NR |
Abbreviations: LA‐NSCLC, locally advanced‐non‐small cell lung cancer; CT, chemotherapy; BSC, best supportive care; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; DFS, disease‐free survival; OS, overall survival; PD‐L1, programmed death‐ligand 1; NA, not available; NR, not reached.