Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biling (Camb Engl). 2023 May 10;26(5):1009–1025. doi: 10.1017/s1366728923000251

Table 4.

Comparing naming performance between healthy bilinguals and bilingual persons with aphasia in the Boston Naming Test.

Beta SE z-value Pr (>|z|)
Intercept (BPWA; English; Cognate) −.626 .736 −.851 .394
Group (HB) 2.558 1.051 2.433 .015 *
Language (Spanish) −.420 .759 −.554 .579
Cognate Status (Noncognate) .699 .333 2.098 .035 *
Group (HB) × Language (Spanish) .381 1.121 .340 .734
Group (HB) × Cognate Status (Noncognate) .745 .142 5.241 < .001 ***
Language (Spanish) × Cognate Status (Noncognate) −.168 .206 −.820 .412

Parameter estimates, standard errors, z-values, and p-values of fixed-effect terms in the statistical model comparing naming performance between healthy bilinguals and bilingual persons with aphasia. All statistically significant results are marked in bold. p-values were estimated using the ‘lmerTest’ package in R (Kuznetsova et al., 2017).

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.

BPWA = bilingual persons with aphasia; HB = healthy bilinguals; SE = standard error.