Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 3;625(7995):566–571. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06873-0

Fig. 4. In vitro activity and in vivo efficacy of zosurabalpin against clinical A. baumannii isolates.

Fig. 4

a, In vitro MIC activity of zosurabalpin against 129 A. baumannii clinical isolates shown as the cumulative percentage (MIC90: zosurabalpin (ZAB) = 1 mg l−1; tigecycline (TGC) = 8 mg l−1; colistin (CST) > 16 mg l−1; meropenem (MEM) > 16 mg l−1). Line listing of the data is provided in Supplementary Table 7. b, The in vivo efficacy of zosurabalpin in a mouse model of infection induced by pan-drug-resistant A. baumannii ACC01073 (zosurabalpin MIC = 2 mg l−1 in CAMHB with 20% human serum). Lung infection was induced by bacterial intratracheal inoculation in immunocompromised mice. Treatment, starting 2 h after infection (0 h), was administered subcutaneously (n = 6 mice per treatment group or vehicle) every 6 h over 24 h for zosurabalpin and every 12 h for tigecycline. Dose–response curve of zosurabalpin total daily doses (mg per kg per day) measured as the bacterial burden reduction (CFU) in infected lungs. Results are presented as mean ± s.d. Statistical significance of the difference in bacterial counts between the control and treated mice was calculated using the one-factor ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test (P < 0.05 was considered to be significant versus T = 0 h); **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Source Data