Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 9;53(1):177–203. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02665-9

Table 2.

Intercorrelations between the domains of mate selection preferences of lesbian women, gay men, and bisexual women and men

Domains of mate selection preference I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. XI.
I. Caring (.89)
II. Adventurous .54 (.88)
III. Enlightened .43 .58 (.85)
IV. Cultivated .63 .54 .42 (.83)
V. Physically attractive .28 .44 .29 .31 (.81)
VI. Wealthy and generous .26 .45 .46 .40 .31 (.82)
VII. Approachable .66 .54 .34 .58 .37 .29 (.76)
VIII. Comedic .47 .53 .33 .44 .35 .17 .45 (.79)
IX. Domestic .36 .35 31 .36 .27 .44 .37 .17 (.62)
X. Like-minded .51 .42 .29 .43 .26 .26 .45 .27 .35 (.74)
XI. Child-friendly .31 .25 .13 .20 .17 .17 .20 .23 .24 .23 (.67)

Cronbach’s alphas are shown in parentheses in the diagonal. All correlations are significant at p < .001