Table 9.
Results of the binomial regression analyses to predict preferences for marriage criteria of lesbian women, gay men, bisexual and heterosexual women and men
“Could you imagine marrying someone …” | Sex of participants | Sexual Orientation: Heterosexual versus lesbian/gay | Sexual Orientation: Heterosexual versus bisexual | Sex × Sexual Orientation: Heterosexual versus lesbian/gay | Sex × Sexual Orientation: Heterosexual versus bisexual | Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
… Who has no employment |
7.88*** [7.40, 8.39] |
1.79** [1.17, 2.75] |
1.14 [0.80, 1.62] |
0.51* [0.29, 0.90] |
0.66 [0.44, 1.02] |
1.01*** [1.01, 1.02] |
… Who has already had children |
0.70*** [0.64, 0.76] |
0.82 [0.47, 1.43] |
1.50 [0.95, 2.38] |
1.02 [0.48, 2.19] |
0.43** [0.24, 0.78] |
0.90*** [0.90, 0.90] |
… Who has another religion |
1.86*** [1.70, 2.04] |
1.02 [0.39, 2.11] |
1.19 [0.69, 2.06] |
0.83 [0.34, 2.03] |
0.92 [0.49, 1.71] |
0.99 [0.99, 0.99] |
… Who already was married |
1.08 [0.96, 1.21] |
0.77 [0.35, 1.69] |
1.32 [0.65, 2.71] |
0.77 [0.27, 2.22] |
0.64 [0.28, 1.46] |
0.88 [0.88, 0.89] |
… Who has another skin color |
2.70*** [2.55, 2.87] |
1.44 [0.93, 2.23] |
1.04 [0.72, 1.48] |
0.74 [0.42, 1.29] |
0.70 [0.46, 1.06] |
1.02*** [1.02, 1.02] |
… Who earns much more |
0.55*** [0.48, 0.63] |
1.17 [0.51, 2.68] |
1.16 [0.65, 2.09] |
1.00 [0.28, 3.50] |
1.16 [0.52, 2.60] |
1.03*** [1.02, 1.04] |
… Who earns much less |
17.53*** [16.09, 19.09] |
2.47** [1.42, 4.30] |
1.70* [1.08, 2.68] |
0.38** [0.20, 0.74] |
0.51** [0.31, 0.85] |
1.03*** [1.03, 1.03] |
… Who does not look good |
0.60*** [0.56, 0.63] |
0.86 [0.57, 1.30] |
0.95 [0.68, 1.32] |
1.41 [0.82, 2.43] |
1.19 [0.87, 1.64] |
1.00 [0.99, 1.00] |
… Who has a higher education |
0.68*** [0.59, 0.79] |
1.86 [0.83, 4.20] |
1.64 [0.91, 2.96] |
0.58 [0.15, 2.22] |
0.54 [0.21, 1.39] |
1.04*** [1.03, 1.05] |
… Who has a lower education |
10.12*** [9.37, 10.92] |
1.95* [1.13, 3.36] |
1.98*** [1.34; 2.91] |
0.42** [0.22, 0.81] |
0.48** [0.31, 0.75] |
1.04*** [1.04, 1.04] |
Answers given on a dichotomous yes or no scale. Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval for Odds ratios are presented. Sex is dummy-coded (higher values for women), age is mean-centered
Significant results are printed bold
***p < .001, **p < .01, *p < .05