Table 3.
The effect of Duplalim on porcine viruses.
| Virus (initial titer) | Final Duplalim dilution | Time (min) | Virus Titer (Log10 TCID50/0.1 mL) | Virus reduction (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Duplalim-treated | ||||
| Seneca valley virus (7.17 TCID50/0.1 mL) |
1:100 | 5 | 7.17 | 6.39 | 83.40 |
| 15 | 7.06 | 4.28 | 99.83 | ||
| 30 | 7.28 | 3.50 | 99.98 | ||
| 60 | 7.17 | 2.83 | 99.99 | ||
| 1:200 | 5 | 7.17 | 6.50 | 78.62 | |
| 10 | 7.06 | 5.50 | 97.22 | ||
| 30 | 7.28 | 5.39 | 98.71 | ||
| 60 | 7.17 | 5.28 | 98.70 | ||
| 1:400 | 5 | 7.17 | 7.06 | 22.96 | |
| 15 | 7.06 | 6.61 | 64.24 | ||
| 30 | 7.28 | 6.50 | 83.40 | ||
| 60 | 7.17 | 6.28 | 87.01 | ||
| Swine influenza (H1N1) (5.17 TCID50/0.1 mL) | 1:100 | 5 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 |
| 15 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 5.06 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 1:200 | 5 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | |
| 15 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 5.06 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 1:400 | 5 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | |
| 15 | 5.17 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 5.06 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| Swine influenza (H3N2) (4.61TCID50/0.1 mL) | 1:100 | 5 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 |
| 15 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 4.72 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 1:200 | 5 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | |
| 15 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 4.72 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 1:400 | 5 | 4.94 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | |
| 15 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 30 | 4.83 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||
| 60 | 4.72 | ≤0.50 | ≥99.99 | ||