Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 4;14:1284648. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1284648

Table 1.

Results of two-way ANOVA of the effects of mycorrhizal inoculum and nutrient supplement on plant variables.

Mycorrhizal inoculum Nutrient supplement Mycorrhizal inoculum × Nutrient supplement
Shoot dry biomass 0.131 (0.721) 1.020 (0.401) 0.415 (0.744)
Root dry biomass 31.163 (0.000) 1.978 (0.144) 2.500 (0.084)
Total dry biomass 8.639 (0.007) 0.544 (0.657) 1.118 (0.361)
Shoot P concentration 817.62 (0.000) 2.770 (0.064) 2.580 (0.077)
Root P concentration 205.32 (0.000) 0.648 (0.592) 2.099 (0.127)
Total P content 370.05 (0.000) 1.252 (0.313) 2.306 (0.102)
Shoot N content 2.809 (0.107) 1.471 (0.247) 0.633 (0.601)
Root N content 21.69 (0.000) 0.759 (0.528) 2.073 (0.13)
Total N content 1.868 (0.184) 1.515 (0.236) 1.213 (0.326)
Shoot 15N (% transferred) 46.68 (0.000) 18.27 (0.000) 0.723 (0.499)
Root 15N (% transferred) 41.75 (0.000) 9.48 (0.002) 2.76 (0.09)
Total 15N (% transferred) 1.447 (0.245) 20.36 (0.000) 1.203 (0.323)

F and p values are indicated. Significant p values (≤0.05) are indicated in bold. Root 15N content was not significantly different between root-free compartment supplied with different nutrient supplements in the NM treatments. However, in M plants, the 15N content of the roots was significantly lower when the root-free compartment was amended with chitin than with the other nutrient supplements (Supplementary Figure S1).