Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 19;10(10):uhad191. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad191

Table 2.

Summary of SNP–trait associations related to sweet cherry fruit quality.

Traits/reference genome Chromosome Physical position (bp) Significance (P value) Model R 2a Allele b /effect c
Fruit stem end cracking (SE)
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 7 21 757 494 1.13e−10 MLMM 5.9 A/G
7 26 772 180 4.88e−07 FarmCPU 3.9 A/C (0.01)
Sweet cherry ‘Satonishiki’ 4 4 381 656 1.13e−10 MLMM 30.9 A/G
1 26 464 729 2.00e−07 FarmCPU 20.9 C/A (0.01)
4 4 381 656 1.38e−14 30.9 A/G (−0.07)
7 17 821 793 2.98e−07 9.6 C/G (0.008)
8 6 129 863 4.13e−07 16.0 C/T (0.01)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 1 18 149 428 1.13e−10 MLMM 4.8 A/T
1 29 966 902 2.12e−09 FarmCPU 5.5 A/G (0.009)
8 11 366 089 4.82e−09 6.0 G/C (0.03)
Fruit pistillar end cracking
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 4 6 606 690 1.38e−09 MLMM 8.9 T/C
1 759 551 1.64e−09 FarmCPU 11.4 A/G (−0.01)
6 22 196 234 6.48e−09 7.7 A/G (−0.009)
6 31 626 357 1.10e−07 3.2 G/A (−0.02)
7 16 540 822 1.77e−07 <0.1 C/T (0.007)
7 24 643 127 6.15e−09 6.9 A/G (0.01)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 1 38 293 536 2.40e−09 MLMM 0.6 A/C
4 13 790 367 9.98e−15 9.0 T/A
1 13 745 047 1.74e−07 FarmCPU 2.8 T/C (−0.01)
4 13 790 367 6.80e−16 9.0 T/A (−0.06)
5 1 152 140 1.39e−08 7.4 A/G (−0.02)
7 7 874 904 7.49e−11 4.9 A/G (−0.03)
Fruit weight (FW)
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 1 11 561 777 4.11e−13 FarmCPU 5.1 T/G (0.82)
1 38 707 331 1.08e−09 2.5 A/T (0.44)
1 50 388 238 5.52e−10 18.8 G/A (−0.57)
2 4 882 204 7.96e−08 5.8 A/G (−0.31)
3 15 787 719 1.34e−07 2.5 T/C (0.45)
3 26 866 585 4.78e−08 1.6 T/C (−0.47)
4 12 024 925 2.12e−07 17.2 A/G (−0.42)
4 21 277 766 4.42e−09 1.9 A/G (0.54)
6 11 112 467 1.59e−08 <0.1 T/C (0.51)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 2 28 325 332 8.87e−08 FarmCPU 7.3 G/A (0.36)
3 21 433 100 6.06e−09 <0.1 A/C (−0.45)
Fruit width
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 1 50 388 238 8.60e−08 FarmCPU 15.0 G/A (−0.79)
3 27 845 320 2.41e−09 <0.1 A/T (−0.61)
7 18 276 189 4.17e−11 8.0 G/A (−0.70)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 1 8 612 931 1.48e−07 FarmCPU <0.1 C/T (−0.69)
Fruit thickness
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 1 50 388 238 3.38e−10 FarmCPU 17.3 G/A (−1.00)
2 4 882 204 3.23e−10 7.2 A/G (−0.68)
2 7 007 862 4.33e−11 <0.1 A/C (−1.00)
6 23 191 731 2.25e−07 3.1 T/C (0.79)
7 18 276 189 2.98e−08 7.5 G/A (−0.60)
7 22 298 828 1.51e−07 <0.1 A/C (−0.58)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 1 34 857 341 1.13e−07 FarmCPU 6.9 C/T (0.68)
2 9 537 634 1.06e−10 8.6 T/C (0.82)
3 21 433 100 3.25e−09 <0.1 A/C (−0.60)
4 20 079 115 3.96e−07 12.6 A/G (0.45)
Stone width
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 2 2 834 950 6.79e−09 FarmCPU 18.8 T/G (0.20)
3 1 281 929 1.32e−08 14.3 T/C (0.21)
4 9 562 013 9.05e−09 11.1 T/C (−0.18)
6 3 901 121 6.49e−10 7.4 T/C (0.28)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 3 4 481 012 1.40e−08 FarmCPU 13.3 C/T (−0.30)
4 4 708 404 4.81e−09 0.4 A/G (−0.22)
4 11 571 511 1.36e−07 1.2 A/C (−0.16)
Stone thickness
Sweet cherry ‘Regina’ 8 21 099 455 1.75e−07 FarmCPU 4.4 A/C (−0.25)
Sweet cherry ‘Satonishiki’ 2 13 099 549 7.32e−15 FarmCPU 27.3 A/G (−0.41)
3 12 470 834 3.69e−07 10.9 T/C (0.16)
4 11 934 189 4.51e−10 14.8 T/A (−0.19)
4 17 172 922 1.35e−07 3.9 T/A (−0.23)
7 10 879 301 4.57e−07 <0.1 C/T (0.14)
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 5 986 062 8.36e−08 FarmCPU 6.3 A/G (−0.37)
8 12 886 531 2.10e−07 12.2 C/T (0.18)
Stone shape in central view
Peach ‘PLov2-2n’ 2 11 962 528 5.52e−12 FarmCPU 19.7 G/C (0.08)
3 20 497 027 8.12e−09 3.3 A/C (−0.10)
3 23 321 947 3.98e−13 1.8 C/G (−0.10)

Allelic effect not available for the MLMM model.

Physical positions in italics indicate identical marker–trait associations between GWAS models.

Physical positions in bold indicate identical marker–trait associations between traits.

a

R 2 is the percentage of variance explained corrected for genome-wide background.

b

The first allele mentioned is the minor allele.

c

The allelic effect is the difference in mean of BLUPs between genotypes with one or other allele (sign: minor allele).