Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 10;71(1):20239901. doi: 10.5578/tt.20239901

Table 3.

Comparison of weaning success and failure groups

Weaning success (n= 14) Weaning failure (n= 18) p
Age, mean ± SD 80.8 ± 8.1 78.2 ± 7.8 0.36
Female sex, n (%) 7 (50) 11 (61.1) 0.72
BMI, mean ± SD 25.7 ± 3.7 26.5 ± 6.4 0.67
CFS, mean ± SD 6.5 ± 1.7 7.6 ± 0.9 0.035
mNUTRIC, mean ± SD 6.1 ± 2.4 7.2 ± 2.3 0.23
GNRI, mean ± SD 90.5 ± 14.9 93.7 ± 15.8 0.57
APACHE-II, median (IQR) 19 (13.7-30.5) 24.5 (17.7-29.2) 0.30
SOFA, median (IQR) 6.5 (3-8.2) 7.5 (5.7-12) 0.12
Sepsis, n (%) 7 (50) 18 (100) <0.001
Vasopressor use, n (%) 6 (42.9) 17 (94.4) 0.004
ARDS, n (%) 0 1 (5.6) >0.99
RRT, n (%) 3 (21.4) 8 (44.4) 0.27
In-hospital mortality, n (%) 5 (35.7) 18 (100) <0.001
RF, median (IQR) 9.6 (6.8-13.1) 9.4 (6.6-12.3) 0.67
RF+VI, median (IQR) 19.8 (13.9-28.6) 18 (13.1-24.4) 0.64

n: Number, SD: Standard deviation, BMI: Body mass index, CFS: Clinical frailty scale, mNUTRIC: Modified nutrition risk in critically ill, GNRI: Geriatric nutritional risk index, APACHE: The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, SOFA: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ARDS: Acute respiratory distress syndrome, RRT: Renal replacement therapy, RF: Rectus femoris, VI: Vastus intermedius.