Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 4;14(1):113. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010113

Table 1.

Summary of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author Year N of Patients Mean Age N of CNs TP TN FP FN Se Sp PPV NPV
Hanna et al. [16] 2007 26 - 27 14 11 2 0 1.00 0.85 0.88 1.00
Nader et al. [19]
(DFN model 1)
2019 52 58 52 8 36 5 3 0.73 0.88 0.62 0.92
Nader et al. [19]
(DFN model 2)
2019 52 58 52 5 41 0 6 0.46 1.00 1.00 0.87
Nader et al. [19]
(SMF)
2019 49 58 49 16 24 5 4 0.8 0.83 0.76 0.86
Baulch et al. [21] 2015 33 62 57 36 16 3 2 0.95 0.84 0.92 0.75
Gandhi et al. [20] 2011 25 59 48 30 17 1 0 1.00 0.94 0.97 1.00
Warren et al. [28] 2016 48 60 48 46 0 0 2 0.96 - 1.00 -
Chang et al. [8] 2004 8 58 8 8 0 0 0 1.00 - 1.00 -
Nemzek et al. [22] 1998 19 55 45 18 0 0 1 0.95 - 1.00 -
Schmalfuss et al. [32] 2002 7 62 7 7 0 0 0 1.00 - 1.00 -
Majoie et al. [29] 1997 2 57 2 2 0 0 0 1.00 - 1.00 -
Shimamoto et al. [30] 2012 13 58 13 8 2 0 3 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.4
Tomura et al. [31] 1999 12 - 12 12 0 0 0 1.00 - 1.00 -

Abbreviations: CNs, cranial nerves; TP, true positive; TN, true negative; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, positive predictive value; DFN, descending facial nerve; SMF, stylomastoid foramen.