Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Issues. 2020 Jan 10;41(9):1597–1625. doi: 10.1177/0192513x19894369

Table 3.

Descriptive Information for Midlife Adults’ Reports of Their Involvement with Grown Children.

Midlife Mothers (Participants) Midlife Fathers (Participants)
Daughter Son Daughter Son ANOVA
(n = 356) (n = 384) (n = 308) (n = 336) F score
Contact
In person contacta M 5.80 5.62 5.25 5.58 3.72
SD 2.01 2.23 2.11 2.23
Telephone contacta M 6.79 6.21 5.88 5.72 19.89***
SD 1.75 1.81 1.91 2.07
Relationship Qualities
Positive relationship qualitiesb M 4.09 4.05 3.95 3.98 1.56
SD 0.96 0.91 0.90 0.83
Negative relationship qualitiesb M 2.18 1.97 2.17 1.90 8.19***
SD 0.87 0.87 0.90 0.83
Support to Grown Children from Participants a
 Emotional support M 6.09 5.44 5.21 4.95 18.23***
SD 2.05 2.17 2.13 2.16
 Listening M 6.50 5.69 5.28 5.32 27.53***
SD 1.82 1.93 2.12 2.15
 Advice M 5.54 4.88 4.81 4.77 12.27***
SD 1.90 1.91 1.85 2.03
 Practical support M 4.08 3.77 3.71 3.59 3.16
SD 2.20 2.28 2.11 2.16
 Financial support M 3.95 3.76 3.75 3.64 1.18
SD 2.23 2.29 2.12 2.10

Note.

a

Contact and support were rated 1 = less than once a year or never; 2 = yearly; 3 = a few times a year; 4 = monthly; 5 = a few times a month; 6 = weekly; 7 = a few times a week; 8 = daily.

b

Average scores of 2 items rated 1 = not at all; 2 = a little bit; 3 = somewhat; 4 = quite a bit; 5 = a great deal.

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.