Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Feb 19;87(5):1147–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.02.024

Table I.

Multivariate outcomes of cirAE incidence and severity by LDH category

Outcome* OR (95% CI) P value
Development of cirAE (any type)
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 0.37 (0.14–0.92) .033
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 0.30 (0.12–0.77) .013
Development of cirAE (subtypes)
 Macular and papular rash
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 0.19 (0.02–1.93) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 1.15 (0.24–5.59) NS
 Pruritus
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 1.43 (0.35–5.84) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 0.51 (0.09–2.85) NS
 Rash NOS
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 1.83 (0.52–6.48) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 0.97 (0.25–3.77) NS
 Other
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 0.82 (0.18–3.78) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 1.63 (0.38–7.03) NS
Low cirAE severity among all patients§
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 1.43 (0.47–4.29) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 3.80 (0.78–10.03) NS
High cirAE severity among all patients§
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 0.70 (0.23–2.11) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 0.36 (0.10–1.28) NS
Low cirAE severity among cirAE patientsǁ
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 0.70 (0.20–2.51) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 1.80 (0.45–7.18) NS
High cirAE severity among cirAE patientsǁ
 High LDH at pre-ICI baseline 1.42 (0.40–5.05) NS
 High LDH at >3 months post-ICI 0.56 (0.14–2.23) NS

CI, Confidence interval; cirAE, cutaneous immune-related adverse event; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NOS, not otherwise specified; NS, not significant; OR, odds ratio.

*

Binomial logistic regression was used for all models. All models included age at the start of ICI regimen, sex, and additional clinical features significant to P<.10 as covariates, with details as follows for each model:Development of cirAE (any type): age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, history of kidney disease, any irAE.Development of cirAE (subtypes): age, sex, ECOG status, history of kidney disease, any irAE.Low or high cirAE severity among all patients: age, sex, ECOG status, history of kidney disease, any irAE.Low or high cirAE severity among cirAE patients: age, sex, ECOG status, history of kidney disease, any irAE.

LDH values were categorized into “high” (>210 U/L) and “low” (≤210 U/L) based on our institution’s laboratory reference range, with 210 U/L being the upper limit of normal.

Reference LDH category for all models is LDH value of “low” (≤210 U/L).

§

cirAE severity was categorized based on peak CTCAE v5.0 grade as determined by any evaluating physician. Category of “high” includes grades 2, 3, or 4 and “low” includes grade 1. Reference cirAE category for models is having no history of cirAE.

ǁ

cirAE severity was categorized based on peak CTCAE v5.0 grade as determined by any evaluating physician. Category of “high” includes grades 2, 3, or 4 and “low” includes grade 1. Reference cirAE category for low cirAE severity models is having no history of grade 1 cirAE. Reference cirAE category for high cirAE severity models is having no history of grades 2–4 cirAE.

Bolded P values represent statistical significance to P<.05.