TABLE 4.
Fine-tune l1, l2, and l3 performances and statistical differences. For each dataset, average Kappa agreement and the percentage of subjects above the threshold of substantial agreement (κ > .6) is given, followed by the group statistic and post hoc analysis between fine-tune l1, l2, and l3 if significant.
| Dataset | N | Fine-tune size | Kappa Mean ± SD |
Substantial agreement (%) | Repeated measures ANOVA: p-value, effect size |
Post-hoc comparison between |
Paired samples t-test: p-value, effect size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSA F3-M2 |
60 | l1 | κ = .74 ± .09 | 95% | p = .17, ηp 2 = .003 | ||
| l2 | κ = .74 ± .09 | 95% | |||||
| l3 | κ = .75 ± .09 | 95% | |||||
| OSA F3-F4 |
60 | l1 | κ = .65 ± .13 | 73% | p < .001, ηp 2 = .03 | l1 & l2 | p = .003, d = .20 |
| l2 | κ = .67 ± .12 | 82% | l1 & l3 | p < .001, d = .39 | |||
| l3 | κ = .70 ± .11 | 83% | l2 & l3 | p = .007, d = .20 | |||
| Insomnia F3-M2 |
60 | l1 | κ = .77 ± .09 | 95% | p = .05, ηp 2 = .005 | ||
| l2 | κ = .77 ± .08 | 97% | |||||
| l3 | κ = .78 ± .07 | 100% | |||||
| Insomnia F3-F4 |
60 | l1 | κ = .70 ± .11 | 85% | p < .001, ηp 2 = .01 | l1 & l2 | p = .20, d = .06 |
| l2 | κ = .71 ± .12 | 85% | l1 & l3 | p < .001, d = .28 | |||
| l3 | κ = .73 ± .11 | 92% | l2 & l3 | p < .001, d = .21 | |||
| RBD F3-M2 |
22 | l1 | κ = .65 ± .09 | 73% | p = .28, ηp 2 = .009 | ||
| l2 | κ = .66 ± .09 | 77% | |||||
| l3 | κ = .67 ± .08 | 91% | |||||
| RBD F3-F4 |
22 | l1 | κ = .56 ± .12 | 41% | p = .02, ηp 2 = .03 | l1 & l2 | p = .04, d = .39 |
| l2 | κ = .60 ± .10 | 50% | l1 & l3 | p = .01, d = .38 | |||
| l3 | κ = .60 ± .11 | 55% | l2 & l3 | p = .99, d = .00 |