Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 5;11:1286627. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1286627

Table 1.

The characteristics of the study respondents.

Male (n = 138) Female (n = 212) Total sample (n = 350) χ2/Z p
Age 10.802 0.001
65–79 62 (44.9%) 59 (27.8%) 121 (34.6%)
≥ 80 76 (55.1%) 153 (72.2%) 229 (65.4%)
Place of residence 0.252 0.615
Urban (city/town) 75 (54.3%) 121 (57.1%) 196 (56.0%)
Rural 63 (45.7%) 91 (42.9%) 154 (44.0%)
Coresidence 0.209 0.901
With household member(s) 74 (54.0%) 112 (53.3%) 186 (53.6%)
Alone 47 (34.3%) 70 (33.3%) 117 (33.7%)
Nursing home 16 (11.7%) 28 (13.3%) 44 (12.7%)
Marital status 17.435 < 0.001
Currently married 47 (34.8%) 32 (15.4%) 79 (23.0%)
Divorced/widowed/single 88 (65.2%) 176 (84.6%) 264 (77.0%)
Educational level 7.892 < 0.001
Illiterate 26 (22.2%) 129 (69.7%) 155 (51.3%)
Primary school 52 (44.4%) 36 (19.5%) 88 (29.1%)
Junior high and above 39 (33.3%) 20 (10.8%) 59 (19.5%)
Self-rated health 0.333 0.739
Excellent/good 53 (38.4%) 82 (38.7%) 135 (38.6%)
Average 58 (42.0%) 81 (38.2%) 139 (39.7%)
Poor/very poor 27 (19.6%) 49 (23.1%) 76 (21.7%)
ADL limitations 4.938 0.026
Yes 16 (11.6%) 44 (20.8%) 60 (17.1%)
No 122 (88.4%) 168 (79.2%) 290 (82.9%)
IADL limitations 33.430 < 0.001
Yes 71 (51.4%) 171 (80.7%) 242 (69.1%)
No 67 (48.6%) 41 (19.3%) 108 (30.9%)
Currently smoked 83.326 < 0.001
Yes 61 (44.9%) 9 (4.3%) 70 (20.3%)
No 75 (55.1%) 199 (95.7%) 274 (79.7%)
Currently drank alcohol 43.043 < 0.001
Yes 37 (27.4%) 7 (3.3%) 44 (12.7%)
No 98 (72.6%) 204 (96.7%) 302 (87.3%)
Exercised regularly 3.821 0.051
Yes 59 (43.1%) 68 (32.7%) 127 (36.8%)
No 78 (56.9%) 140 (67.3%) 218 (63.2%)
Participated in outdoor activities 0.139 0.709
Yes 88 (63.8%) 131 (61.8%) 219 (62.6%)
No 50 (36.2%) 81 (38.2%) 131 (37.4%)
Participated in social activities 0.373 0.541
Yes 20 (14.6%) 36 (17.1%) 55 (16.1%)
No 117 (85.4%) 175 (82.9%) 292 (83.9%)
Self-rated financial status 1.007 0.281
Very rich/rich 25 (18.8%) 30 (14.5%) 55 (16.2%)
Average 79 (59.4%) 125 (60.4%) 204 (60.0%)
Poor/very poor 29 (21.8%) 52 (25.1%) 81 (23.8%)
Psychological consulting services in community 1.553 0.213
Yes 19 (14.2%) 40 (19.4%) 59 (17.4%)
No 115 (85.8%) 166 (80.6%) 281 (82.6%)
SWB score 2.104 0.035
Median (Q1, Q3) 23.0 (19,25) 21.5 (18.25,25) 22.0 (19,25)
Range 8–30 7–30 7–30