Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 5;11:1288507. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1288507

Table 3.

Parent participant characteristics (n = 23).

No. Child Sex Ethnicity Parent Age (years) Religion Highest education qualification Monthly income (SGD) Time points
1 Samuel M Chinese Father 56 Christianity Post-graduate 6,000–8,999 1
2 Xinle F Chinese Mother 40 No religion Polytechnic 3,000–5,999 2
3 Ethan M Chinese Mother 35 Buddhism Secondary 3,000–5,999 2
4 Benji M Chinese Mother 43 Buddhism Secondary 3,000–5,999 2
5 Enning F Chinese Mother 35 Buddhism Undergraduate 1,500–2,999 2
6 Noah M Chinese Father 38 No religion Post-graduate 6,000–8,999 2
7 Linda F Chinese Father and Mother 42 No religion Undergraduate 6,000–8,999 2
8 Chris M Chinese Mother 39 Buddhism Polytechnic <1,499 2
9 Sage M Chinese Father 50 Buddhism Post-graduate >15,000 2
10 Niya F Indian Father and Mother 75 Islam Secondary 1,500–2,999 2
11 Jacinta F Indian Mother 39 Islam Polytechnic 6,000–8,999 2
12 Raul M Indian Father 40 Hinduism Post-graduate 12,000–14,999 2
13 Mithya F Indian Mother 40 Hinduism Undergraduate Not available 1
14 Ananda M Indian Father 44 Hinduism Post-graduate 3,000–5,999 2
15 Aish M Malay Mother 42 Islam Junior College 6,000–8,999 2
16 Raman M Malay Mother and Father 35 Islam Polytechnic 3,000–5,999 2
17 Nassim M Malay Mother 43 Islam Primary 3,000–5,999 2
18 Halim M Malay Mother 40 Islam Polytechnic 6,000–8,999 2
19 Nurul F Malay Mother and Father 31 Islam Primary <1,499 1
20 Abdul M Malay Mother 35 Islam Post-graduate 1,500–2,999 1
21 Aziqah F Malay Mother 35 Islam Secondary <1,499 1
22 Taufiq M Malay Mother 50 Islam Undergraduate 6,000–8,999 2
23 Gideon M Others, Israeli Mother and Father 42 Jewish Post-graduate 6,000–8,999 2

Parent characteristics were reported for parents (bold) who participated in the quantitative survey of the SHACK study.