Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 5;4:1233293. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1233293

Table 4.

TCM groups did not differ on QST.

Score name TCM#1 (Equal) (Mean ± SD) TCM#2 (Deficiency) (Mean ± SD) TCM#3 (Stagnation) (Mean ± SD) Healthy (Mean ± SD)
Mechanical detection threshold (forearm) 0.2673 ± 0.1852 0.3346 ± 0.6821 0.4193 ± 0.2986 0.4276 ± 0.2605
Mechanical pain threshold (forearm) 61.00 ± 61.01 95.38 ± 57.83 70.68 ± 49.89 93.64 ± 85.84
Temporal summation (forearm) 14.31 ± 11.94 12.46 ± 9.314 15.13 ± 12.70 11.54 ± 11.90
Cold detection threshold (forearm) −1.983 ± 0.7309 −1.947 ± 0.7643 −2.907 ± 1.328 −2.400 ± 1.147
Cold pain threshold (forearm) −8.864 ± 7.710 −10.19 ± 7.673 −9.147 ± 5.725 −14.41 ± 9.501
Heat detection threshold (forearm) 3.508 ± 1.179 3.233 ± 1.174 3.820 ± 2.474 3.424 ± 1.710
Heat pain threshold (forearm) 6.892 ± 4.024 8.940 ± 2.817 7.927 ± 3.499 8.038 ± 3.296
Pressure pain threshold (trapezius) 243.9 ± 94.83 215.1 ± 100.5 219.5 ± 76.08 271.8 ± 122.8
Pressure pain tolerance (trapezius) 336.9 ± 145.5 324.0 ± 124.8 386.6 ± 175.7 439.6 ± 244.0
Conditioned pain modulation (trapezius) 46.67 ± 56.90 49.21 ± 101.8 70.71 ± 105.2 35.53 ± 54.81

No significant differences between TCM groups on any QST outcomes were detected although deficiency showed an insignificantly elevated mechanical pain threshold and heat pain threshold in the forearm whereas equal group displayed a slightly but insignificantly increased pressure pain threshold in the trapezius as compared with two other groups.