Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 19;22:54. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01464-y

Table 2.

Evaluating Biomarkers in Identifying CAD Severity

Biomarker Comparisons of different CAD severities
MI VS Control UA VS Control SACD VS Control
AUC P value 95% CI AUC P value 95% CI AUC P value 95% CI
Gut bacterial species
Faecalibacterium_prausnitzii 0.728 <  0.001 0.647–0.81 0.717 <  0.001 0.645–0.79 0.78 <  0.001 0.703–0.856
Dorea_longicatena 0.659 0.002 0.565–0.753 0.746 <  0.001 0.659–0.833
Eubacterium_ramulus 0.654 0.003 0.556–0.753
Lachnospiraceae_bacterium_1_1_57FAA 0.664 0.001 0.575–0.752
Lactobacillus_mucosae 0.646 0.004 0.544–0.747
Megasphaera_micronuciformis 0.607 0.036 0.502–0.712
Eubacterium_hallii 0.646 0.001 0.564–0.728
Roseburia_hominis 0.669 <  0.001 0.59–0.748
Anaerostipes_hadrus 0.633 0.002 0.55–0.716 0.681 0.001 0.581–0.78
Ruminococcus_obeum 0.648 0.001 0.5690.728 0.716 <  0.001 0.626–0.806
Ruminococcus_sp_51_39BFAA 0.669 <  0.001 0.588–0.75 0.751 <  0.001 0.659–0.844
Bacteroides_ovatus 0.731 < 0.001 0.637–0.824
Dorea_formicigenerans 0.628 0.017 0.527–0.728
Ruminococcus_bromii 0.698 < 0.001 0.603–0.792
Ruminococcus_torques 0.699 < 0.001 0.594–0.804
Fecal metabolites
Cyclohexylsulfamate 0.763 0.025 0.512–1
1-Palmitoylglycerol 0.831 0.005 0.677–0.986
Phe-Ile 0.763 0.025 0.56–0.966
2-Dehydro-3-deoxy-D-gluconate 0.712 0.013 0.549–0.875
Ile-Thr 0.688 0.028 0.511–0.865