TABLE 3.
Production results based on SL crude extract LC–UV quantification.
Run | Combination | Crude extract | Total SL in the crude mix | Relative abundance of diacetylated lactonic C18:1 over total SL | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(Total g) | (g g−1 DMi) | (g g-1) | (%) a | ||
1 | +++ | 1.788 | 0.153 | 0.628 | 55.56 |
2 | -++ | 1.315 | 0.131 | 0.518 | 59.93 |
3 | -0- | 1.412 | 0.141 | 0.460 | 60.92 |
4 | +00 | 1.885 | 0.162 | 0.638 | 61.17 |
5 | 0-- | 0.810 | 0.075 | 0.495 | 60.40 |
6 | +0+ | 1.895 | 0.163 | 0.709 | 64.50 |
7 | 0-+ | 1.614 | 0.149 | 0.660 | 68.97 |
8 | --+ | 1.451 | 0.145 | 0.454 | 66.88 |
9 | 000a | 1.690 | 0.156 | 0.679 | 67.18 |
10 | 0–0 | 1.604 | 0.148 | 0.445 | 62.99 |
11 | +0- | 1.213 | 0.104 | 0.648 | 67.99 |
12 | +-- | 1.509 | 0.130 | 0.317 | 69.61 |
13 | ++- | 1.834 | 0.157 | 0.488 | 66.68 |
14 | -+0 | 1.372 | 0.137 | 0.458 | 65.09 |
15 | --- | 1.044 | 0.104 | 0.447 | 70.54 |
16 | −0+ | 1.343 | 0.134 | 0.505 | 64.50 |
17 | +-+ | 1.860 | 0.160 | 0.670 | 56.09 |
18 | 000b | 1.561 | 0.144 | 0.673 | 69.52 |
19 | 000c | 1.691 | 0.156 | 0.640 | 68.62 |
20 | 0 + 0 | 1.540 | 0.142 | 0.529 | 65.18 |
21 | 00+a | 1.687 | 0.156 | 0.689 | 65.59 |
22 | ++0 | 1.866 | 0.160 | 0.595 | 56.42 |
23 | - + - | 1.034 | 0.103 | 0.508 | 59.24 |
24 | --0 | 1.170 | 0.117 | 0.431 | 66.97 |
25 | 00-a | 1.634 | 0.151 | 0.535 | 67.63 |
26 | −00 | 1.214 | 0.121 | 0.406 | 68.62 |
27 | 00-b | 1.673 | 0.154 | 0.500 | 70.19 |
28 | 00-c | 1.481 | 0.137 | 0.367 | 71.43 |
29 | 0+- | 1.620 | 0.149 | 0.466 | 70.08 |
30 | +-0 | 1.905 | 0.164 | 0.522 | 68.85 |
31 | 00 + b | 1.532 | 0.141 | 0.615 | 65.42 |
32 | 00 + c | 1.726 | 0.159 | 0.709 | 68.51 |
33 | 0++ | 1.431 | 0.132 | 0.591 | 62.43 |
Percentage values were calculated based on the SL relative area on the crude extract. DMi, initial dry matter.
a,b,c are biological replicates at the central point for the corresponding fermentation time.