Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 16;8(4):283–298. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2023-0002

Table 3:

Analytical performance results for assessed sample collection techniques

Target N Min. Q1 Mean STD. Median Q3 Max.
RNase P NP 311 21.12 28.75 29.80 1.90 29.95 30.86 35.28
SG 308 24.00 27.74 28.71 1.73 28.67 29.90 33.44
TN 297 25.06 29.11 30.65 2.27 30.74 32.17 38.29
NP vs. SG Mean Ct Difference 1.0921 p-value <0.0001
NP vs. TN Mean Ct Difference -0.8580 p-value <0.0001
E gene NP 148 11.88 15.81 20.05 5.89 18.22 22.35 39.00
SG 148 14.64 20.84 24.50 4.80 24.32 26.76 38.17
TN 148 15.25 18.26 21.54 4.55 20.06 23.79 36.15
NP vs. SG Mean Ct Difference −4.4047 p-value <0.0001
NP vs. TN Mean Ct Difference −1.5001 p-value 0.0008
RdRp gene NP 145 13.0 16.2 20.0 5.2 18.2 22.4 39.7
SG 144 14.8 21.1 24.4 4.1 24.5 27.0 33.1
TN 144 15.5 18.7 21.8 4.4 20.4 24.3 35.2
NP vs. SG Mean Ct Difference -4.4163 p-value <0.0001
NP vs. TN Mean Ct Difference -1.7492 p-value <0.0001

Note: Buccal-bilateral nares collections are not captured in this table due to low sample sizes

NP = nasopharyngeal swab; SG = saline gargle; TN = throat-bilateral nares