Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2023 Jul 17;148(3):210–219. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064351

Table 2:

Adjusted association between Zip-code-level redlining proportion with the risk of heart failure in White and Black beneficiaries.

Beneficiaries of Black Race Beneficiaries of White Race
RR (95% CI) P Value RR (95% CI) P-Value
Model 1 1.09 (1.05–1.13) <0.001 0.94 (0.88–0.99) 0.02
Model 2 1.08 (1.04–1.12) <0.001 0.94 (0.89–0.99) 0.02
Model 3 1.04 (1.002–1.08) 0.04 0.90 (0.85–0.95) <0.001

Zip-code-level redlining proportion assessed categorically as Quartile 4 (highest proportion of redlined area) compared to Quartiles 1–3 (reference, lowest proportion of redlined area).

Model 1 includes age + sex. Model 2 includes model 1 + comorbidities. Model 3 includes age, sex, comorbidities + Social Deprivation Index.

Models are generalized linear models, with patients’ variables as fixed effects, Zip-code as random intercept, with Poisson distribution and log time patient was alive as offset term.

Abbreviations: RR = risk ratio. CI = confidence interval.