Table 1.
Advantages and Drawbacks of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods
| Isolation method | Advantages | Drawbacks |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Differential ultracentrifugation | • Common method | • Low scalability |
| • Medium to high yield | • Labor-intensive | |
| • Time-consuming | ||
| • Possible aggregation or rupture of EVs | ||
| • Possible contamination with lipoproteins | ||
| Density gradient ultracentrifugation | • Potential to identify EV subpopulations | • Low scalability |
| • High purity | • Labor-intensive | |
| • Low amount of non-EV contaminants | • Time-consuming | |
| Size-exclusion chromatography | • Fast and straightforward protocol | • Often needs another method to concentrate isolated EVs |
| • Preserved integrity of isolated EVs | ||
| • Highly scalable | ||
| Ultrafiltration | • Straightforward protocol | • Less common method |
| Tangential flow filtration | • Good EV yield | • Often needs another method to concentrate isolated EVs |
| • No EV aggregation | ||
| • Batch-to-batch consistency | • Favorable for functional EV studies | |
| • Suitable for large starting volumes | ||
| Immunoaffinity-based capture | • High purity | • Lower yield |
| • Possibility of isolating subpopulations expressing a certain marker | • May not isolate all EVs | |
| • Higher cost | ||
| Precipitation | • Fast and straightforward protocol | • High amount of non-EV contaminants |
| • Polymer remnants in the isolated EV sample | ||