Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: Compr Physiol. 2023 Jun 26;13(3):4631–4658. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c210046

Table 2.

Potential of Circulating Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers in Human NAFLD

Comparison groups Association Cargo References

NASH with F3 fibrosis versus cirrhotic NASH and healthy control Hepatocyte-derived EVs, isolated from serum, correlated with clinical characteristics and disease severity Specific proteomic signatures (175)
NASH versus HCV and healthy control Microparticles from invariant natural killer T cells and macrophages/monocytes, correlated with severity of NASH Not assessed (101)
NASH with F3–4 versus early NAFLD Leukocytes or endothelial cell EVs inversely correlated with fibrosis Not assessed (226)
NASH with early fibrosis versus steatosis EVs in serum are increased in NASH Integrin β1 (60)
NASH with early fibrosis versus steatosis and obese controls EVs in plasma C16:0 ceramide, and its metabolite sphingosine 1 phosphate (88)
Obese with elevated ALT versus obese with normal ALT versus lean subjects with normal ALT Hepatocyte-derived EVs in plasma correlated with ALT mitochondrial DNA (52)
NASH with advanced versus early fibrosis Circulating hepatocyte-derived exosomes in serum increased in advanced fibrosis miR 122 and miR 192 (115)
NASH versus NAFLD and healthy control Hepatocyte-derived exosomes are increased in NASH miR-192-5p (134)
NASH versus chronic hepatitis C, chronic hepatitis B, and healthy controls The miR expression profile in exosome rich fraction from serum correlated with etiology miR panel (miR- 225-5p, -1275, -368, -762, 320c, -451, -1974, -630, -1207-5p, -720, -1246, and -486-5p) (160)