TABLE 5.
Relationship between diagnoses assigned by model 2 regression equations (using the default cutoff) and Banff histologic diagnoses
| Regression diagnoses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMR | Mixed | No rejection | TCMR | Total | |
| Banff histology diagnoses | |||||
| AMR | 261 | 4 | 68 | 0 | 333 |
| Mixed | 38 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 56 |
| No rejection | 55 | 3 | 827 | 2 | 887 |
| pAMR | 50 | 0 | 34 | 0 | 84 |
| pTCMR (borderline) | 7 | 4 | 109 | 8 | 128 |
| TCMR | 13 | 18 | 43 | 65 | 139 |
| BK | 0 | 1 | 38 | 13 | 52 |
| Total | 424 | 40 | 1124 | 91 | 1679 |
Bolding denotes concordance between Banff histology diagnoses and regression diagnoses.
AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; BK, polyoma virus; pAMR, possible AMR; pTCMR, possible TCMR; TCMR, T-cell–mediated rejection.