Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 19;108(2):445–454. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004783

TABLE 7.

Effect of considering model 2 regression scores on interpretation of biopsies with no Banff histology rejection (biopsies with BK removed)

Recorded histology and molecular features in 887 biopsies with no rejection by Banff guidelines Regression diagnoses
No rejection (N = 827) TCMR (N = 2) Mixed (N = 3) AMR (N = 55)
Histology lesion scores, plus DSA and C4d
 TCMR-related
  t (tubulitis) 0.11 2.00 c 2.67 c 0.23 a
  i (interstitial infiltrate) 0.22 2.00 c 3.00 c 0.73 c
 All rejection–related
  v (vasculitis) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 c
 AMR-related
  g (glomerulitis) 0.11 0.00 0.50 1.51 c
  ptc (capillaritis) 0.08 0.00 3.00 c 1.04 c
  cg (double contours) 0.05 0.00 0.00 1.02 c
 Atrophy-fibrosis-related
  ci (scarring) 1.06 2.50 a 1.67 1.51 c
  ct (atrophy) 1.00 2.50 1.67 1.27
 DSA-related
  DSA positivity 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.32
 C4d-related
  C4d positivity 0.06 0.50 a 0.14
Transcript set and molecular classifier scores
 TCMR-related classifiers
  TCMR classifier (TCMRProb) 0.04 0.21 a 0.22 b 0.04 a
 All rejection–related
  Rejection classifier (RejProb) 0.15 0.33 0.61 a 0.45 c
  IFNG-inducible (GRIT3) 0.39 0.87 a 1.18 b 0.65 c
 AMR-related
  DSA-selective (DSAST) 0.09 0.04 0.20 0.39 c
  NK cell burden (NKB) 0.40 0.60 0.83 a 0.87 c
  AMRd classifier (ABMRProb) 0.10 0.06 0.08 0.32 c

Wilcoxon test compared with the no-rejection group (significant values are bolded):

aP < 0.05;

bP < 0.01;

cP < 0.001.

dAMR is used throughout this article per journal style; however, the official classifier name is provided in this table.

AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; BK, polyoma virus; DSA, donor-specific antibody; IFNG, interferon gamma; TCMR, T-cell–mediated rejection.