Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2021;27(1):31–55. doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020030909

TABLE 4:

Descriptive table for engineering professional identification and affinities toward engineering professional practices

Variable Pooled (n = 2,256) Male (n = 1,365) Female (n = 891) Effect Size Sig.
Engineering professional identity (EPI) 5.05 (1.26) 5.17 (1.28) 4.87 (1.21) 0.24 *
Project management 4.26 (0.59) 4.22 (0.59) 4.32 (0.58) −0.17 *
Framing and solving problems 4.50 (0.47) 4.48 (0.47) 4.53 (0.46) −0.12 *
Collaboration 4.08 (0.59) 4.07 (0.60) 4.08 (0.58) −0.02 n.s.
Analysis 4.03 (0.75) 4.07 (0.60) 3.96 (0.79) 0.15 *
Design 4.12 (0.63) 4.15 (0.61) 4.08 (0.66) 0.12 *
Tinkering 3.96 (0.88) 4.07 (0.86) 3.80 (0.90) 0.31 *

Significance calculated using a two-tailed t-test. Adjusted threshold for pairwise comparisons using a Bonferroni correction: *p < 0.007.

n.s. = not significant.

Note: EPI is on a scale of 1 to 8. All other variables are on a scale of 1 to 5.