Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Women Minor Sci Eng. 2021;27(1):31–55. doi: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2020030909

TABLE 6:

Regression analyses predicting engineering professional identity with interactions between gender and affinities toward engineering practices

Gender Interactions
 Female × Project management 0.14 (0.11)
 Female × Framing and solving problems 0.35* (0.15)
 Female × Collaboration −0.15 (0.11)
 Female × Analysis −0.07 (0.08)
 Female × Design −0.09 (0.12)
 Female × Tinkering −0.13~ (0.07)
Constant 1.13*** (0.32)
Observations n = 2256
Adjusted R-squared 0.214

The model includes the main effects of gender, affinity variables, and student background variables (as seen in model 3 of Table 5).

~

p ≤ 0.10;

*

p ≤ 0.05,

**

p ≤ 0.01,

***

p ≤ 0.001.