Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 29;95(1):18–33. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02208-3

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment.

1. Selection bias–Sequence generation 2. Selection bias–Baseline characteristics 3. Selection bias– Allocation concealment 4. Performance bias–Random housing 5. Performance bias–Blinding 6. Detection bias–Random outcome 7. Detection bias–Blinding 8. Attrition bias–Incomplete outcome data 9. Reporting bias–Selective outcome reporting 10. Other–Other sources of bias Blinding mentioned Randomization mentioned Sample size calculation Ethical approval mentioned Conflict of interest statement mentioned
Cho et al. (2016)34 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
Ding et al. (2015)22 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
Ding et al. (2017)23 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
Larpthaveesarp et al. (2021)37 ? Low ? ? ? ? Low ? ? ? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Kim et al. (2012)35 ? Low ? ? ? ? ? ? ? High Yes Yes No Yes No
Lee et al. (2010)36 ? ? ? ? ? ? Low ? ? High Yes Yes No Yes No
Li et al. (2014)24 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No No Yes
Ohshima et al. (2015)40 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? High Yes Yes No Yes No
Sakai et al. (2018)41 ? Low ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
van Velthoven et al. (2017)38 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
van Velthoven et al. (2013)33 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No No No Yes Yes
van Velthoven et al. (2010)29 ? ? ? ? ? ? Low ? ? ? Yes Yes No Yes No
van Velthoven et al. (2010)31 ? ? ? ? ? ? Low ? ? High Yes No No Yes No
van Velthoven et al. (2010)32 ? ? ? ? ? ? Low ? ? High Yes No No Yes No
van Velthoven et al. (2012)30 ? ? ? ? ? ? Low ? ? ? Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Wei et al. (2015)39 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Xia et al. (2010)25 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Yang et al. (2020)28 Low ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No Yes No Yes Yes
Zhang et al. (2014)26 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? High No Yes No Yes No
Zhou et al. (2015)27 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? No No No Yes Yes

? = unclear risk of bias; Low = low risk of bias; High = high risk of bias.