Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 4;25(1):177–185. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01578-7

Table 3.

Sensitivity and subgroup analyses of the cost-effectiveness of pre-operative compared to post-operative RT

Scenario Cost difference Effect difference ICER
Base case 6859 − 13.9 Dominated
Sensitivity analysis
 Outpatient costs adjusted + 1SD 6714 − 13.9 Dominated
 Outpatient costs adjusted -1SD 7002 − 13.9 Dominated
 Inpatient costs adjusted + 1SD 6897 − 13.9 Dominated
 Inpatient costs adjusted -1SD 6819 − 13.9 Dominated
 Indirect costs adjusted + 1SD 2962 − 13.9 Dominated
 Indirect costs adjusted –1SD 10,754 − 13.9 Dominated
 Effect-adjusted + 1SD 6859 − 9.8 Dominated
 Effect-adjusted –1SD 6859 − 18.0 Dominated
Subgroup analyses
Age
 23–65 (47/51) 2842 − 12.9 Dominated
 66–84 (51/60) 8532 − 14.9 Dominated
Gender
 Female (32/43) 3232 − 10.1 Dominated
 Male (66/68) 9509 − 14.5 Dominated
Clinical stage
 I/II (49/56) 10,746 − 10.6 Dominated
 III/IVA (49/55) 2884 − 17.2 Dominated
Subsite
 Tongue/floor of mouth (66/79) 8348 − 14.2 Dominated
 Gingiva and other oral subsites (32/32) 5889 − 13.9 Dominated

All costs are expressed in PPP-adjusted Euro (€) for 2019 and effects in percentage points. Population size for pre- versus post-op RT in paratheses

PPP purchasing power parity, RT radiotherapy, SD standard deviation