Skip to main content
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
. 2023 Nov 6;38(1):469–476. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16919

Effects of soaked hay on lung function and airway inflammation in horses with severe asthma

Roxane Westerfeld 1, Flavie Payette 1, Valérie Dubuc 1, Estelle Manguin 1, Khristine Picotte 1, Guy Beauchamp 2, Christian Bédard 3, Mathilde Leclere 1,
PMCID: PMC10800199  PMID: 37930110

Abstract

Background

Reducing inhaled dust particles improves lung function in horses with severe asthma. Soaked hay is commonly used by owners, but its efficacy in improving lung function and inflammation has not been documented.

Objectives

To measure the effects of soaked hay and alfalfa pellets in horses with severe asthma.

Animals

Ten adult horses with severe asthma from a research colony.

Methods

Prospective controlled trial. Horses in clinical exacerbation were housed indoors and allocated to be fed either soaked hay (n = 5) or alfalfa pellets (n = 5) for 6 weeks. Soaked hay was immersed for 45 minutes and dried out hay was discarded between meals. Pulmonary function and clinical scores were measured before and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Tracheal mucus scores and bronchoalveolar lavages were performed before and after 6 weeks. Lung function was analyzed with a linear mixed model using log‐transformed data.

Results

Lung resistance decreased from (median (range)) 2.47 (1.54‐3.95) to 1.59 (0.52‐2.10) cmH2O/L/s in the pellets group and from 1.89 (1.2‐3.54) to 0.61 (0.42‐2.08) cmH2O/L/s in the soaked hay group over the 6‐week period for an average difference of 1.06 cmH2O/L/s for pellets (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.09‐2.04, P = .03, not significant after correction) and 1.31 cmH2O/L/s for soaked hay (95% CI: −0.23 to 2.85, P < .001, significant).

Conclusion and Clinical Importance

Soaked hay can control airway obstruction in horses with severe asthma. The strict protocol for soaking and discarding dried‐out hay in this study could however be considered too great of an inconvenience by owners.

Keywords: equine, heaves, inflammatory airway disease, recurrent airway obstruction


Abbreviations

BALF

bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

CI

confidence interval

E L

lung elastance

P L

transpulmonary pressure

ΔP L

difference in transpulmonary pressure

R L

lung resistance

1. INTRODUCTION

Severe equine asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by labored breathing, cough, and increased mucus production. Clinical exacerbations are induced by the inhalation of antigens and inorganic dusts from the environment, most of them inhaled during feeding. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 These antigens include endotoxins, mold, mites, β‐glucans, and inorganic dusts, and are associated with pulmonary inflammation. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 Respirable dusts (<5 μm) are primarily inhaled in stables during dry hay feeding. Their concentration varies with the type of bedding and feed. 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 Environmental control of dust is essential for the long‐term management of asthma in horses. 12 , 13 To this end, many feeding strategies can decrease antigen exposure, but all have their limitations. Hay pellets are effective but are usually more expensive than hay and have been associated with behavioral changes. 2 , 4 , 14 Other strategies include haylage, silage, steamed hay, or oiled‐mixed hay feeding systems that require specific equipment or vaccination against botulism. 4 , 15 , 16

Soaking or briefly immersing hay is a common practice used by owners of horses with asthma. 17 , 18 , 19 The duration of soaking varies from a few minutes to a few hours, and hay is sometimes simply hosed down. 17 , 19 , 20 Soaking hay for 10 or 30 minutes reduces respirable particles by up to 90% for a period of 1 to 2 hours, decreases respirable dust concentrations (0.5‐5 μm) in the breathing zone, 5 , 21 , 22 , 23 and tends to decrease endotoxin and mold content, although not significantly. 22 , 24 Soaked hay seems to confer transient hygienic properties necessary for an antigen avoidance strategy. Owners of horses with asthma reported a decrease in coughing and an overall clinical improvement with soaked hay. 20 To our knowledge, the effect of soaked hay on lung function and inflammation has not been documented.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of soaked hay on lung function, inflammation, and clinical scores of horses with severe asthma. It was hypothesized that soaked hay would improve these parameters but less so than feeding a diet of pelleted hay.

2. METHODS

2.1. Horses

Ten horses with severe asthma belonging to the Equine Asthma Research Laboratory of the Université de Montréal were studied. All horses had history of severe asthma with documented clinical signs (breathing difficulty at rest and coughing), pulmonary neutrophilia, and difference in transpulmonary pressure (ΔP L) >15 cmH20 when exposed to dry hay. Other than their respiratory condition, they were deemed healthy based on history, physical examination and complete blood count. The number of horses was selected based on an expected 50% to 65% decrease in lung resistance, based on previous studies. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Canadian Council for Animal Care guidelines and were approved by the animal care committee of the Université de Montréal.

2.2. Study design

Exacerbation was induced over a 4‐week period during which horses were housed indoors and fed dry hay. Throughout the study, they were housed on wood shavings, had access to a dry paddock for 2 to 6 hours a day, and received 500 mg of supplements with vitamins and minerals daily. Horses received either “dusty hay” (hay that had been bailed wet the previous summer), “normal hay” (subjectively less dusty), or a mix of both, based on their history of previous exacerbations over the previous 2 years (type of hay and turnouts duration typically inducing a clinical exacerbation over a 4‐week period). The same hay given during the exacerbation period was used during the study period, that is, horses receiving dusty hay for exacerbation received soaked dusty hay if they were allocated to the soaked hay group. In compliance with the animal care protocol, clinical scores, attitude, and appetite were monitored at least 3 times a week, in addition to daily observations by barn personnel. Horses with severe and persistent clinical signs were required to have increased turnout time, to receive short‐acting bronchodilators (salbutamol), or to be excluded from of the study and receive intravenous dexamethasone if high scores persisted despite initial interventions. After the exacerbation period, turnouts varied between horses but remained the same for an individual horse from weeks 0 to 6.

Once in exacerbation (week 0), horses were ranked according to the severity of their respiratory obstruction (resistance [R L] value). The “odd” group consisted of horses 1 (highest resistance), 3 (3rd highest resistance), 5, 7, and 9, and the “even” group consisted of horses 2 (2nd highest resistance), 4, 6, 8, and 10. Group allocation was then done by flipping a coin: the odd group received alfalfa pellets and the even group received soaked hay. Horses received approximately 2% of their body weight in hay or pellets daily. The hay was completely immersed in cold water for 45 minutes in a large storage container. It was then coarsely drained before being placed at ground level in the stalls. The remaining hay that had dried was discarded before the next meal. Pellets were placed in a feeder. Respiratory clinical scores and weight were assessed weekly and lung function was measured on weeks 0, 2, 4, and 6. Pulmonary inflammation was evaluated on weeks 0 and 6 with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology and tracheal mucus scoring. To evaluate the persistence of residual bronchoconstriction, pulmonary function was measured at the end of the study, before, and 10 minutes after the administration of a bronchodilator (hyoscine butylbromide, 0.3 mg/kg, IV, Buscopan, Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica). Evaluators were blinded to group allocation for clinical scores and lung function, and to group and time points for BALF cytology and mucus scoring.

2.3. Pulmonary function

Respiratory clinical scores ranged from 2 to 8, based on nasal flare and abdominal effort during breathing. 25 , 26 The measurement of lung function was performed on horses at rest, without sedation. The difference in transpulmonary pressure (∆P L) was estimated using a rigid esophageal balloon catheter, introduced to mid‐thorax and connected to a differential pressure transducer. The flow of air was measured using a pneumotachograph connected to a rigid face mask that allows tidal volume measurement (Flexiware 7.6, SCIREQ, Montréal, Quebec, Canada). Lung resistance (R L) and lung elastance (E L) were determined using the change in transpulmonary pressure and flow via a multiple regression equation for the single compartment model of the lung (ΔP L = E L V + R L  + k; V is the volume, the airflow, and k the transpulmonary end‐expiratory pressure).

2.4. Tracheal mucus scoring and bronchoalveolar lavages

The amount of mucus was assessed blindly by a veterinarian (RW) from the images taken during bronchoscopy according to a score ranging from 1 to 5 as previously published. 27 Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed under sedation with xylazine (0.4 mg/kg, IV) and butorphanol (10‐20 μg/kg, IV), using a 1.6 m video‐endoscope introduced through the nose and into the right main bronchus. A local anesthetic was infused in the distal trachea and bronchi (60 mL of 0.5% lidocaine hydrochloride). Two boluses of 250 mL of warm isotonic saline were instilled and re‐aspirated. Cytocentrifugations from unfiltered BALF were prepared and stained with a modified Wright‐Giemsa solution. Bronchoalveolar lavage cytology differential was evaluated on 400 cells, excluding epithelial cells, by a board‐certified clinical pathologist (CB). The proportion of neutrophils was considered normal when below or equal to 5%.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Lung function, differential cell count and weight were analyzed with a linear mixed model with treatment (soaked hay vs pellets), time and the interaction between treatment and time as fixed effects, and with the treatment nested within the subject as random effect (this accounts for repeated measures for each subject over time with each treatment). A priori contrasts were performed to compare the means within the same treatment at different time points compared with week 0, and the means between treatments at each time point. The alpha level was adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini‐Hochberg method. For BALF cytology, normality of the residual values was evaluated visually with quantile‐quantile plots. Lung function data was log‐10 transformed to normalize the distributions. Ordinal data, mucus and respiratory clinical scores were analyzed with the Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel test. Spearman correlation test was used to evaluate the association between pulmonary function parameters, clinical scores, and cell count differential in bronchoalveolar lavage. Pre‐ and post‐bronchodilation data were compared with paired t‐tests. Where appropriate, data are represented as the difference between group means with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses and figures were performed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS vs. 9.3, Cary, North Carolina) and GraphPad Prism (9.0.1, GraphPad Software).

3. RESULTS

3.1. Horses

Six mares and 4 geldings were studied. They were 14.2 (mean) ± 2.4 (SD) years old, weighed 540 ± 63 kg, and were of various breeds (8 Quarter Horses or Paint Horses, 1 Canadian Horse, 1 Thoroughbred). During the exacerbation period, turnouts were adjusted as described above, but no medication was administered, and no horse was excluded.

3.2. Respiratory clinical scores

Clinical scores decreased gradually over time in both groups (P = .0002 and <.0001 for soaked hay and pellets, respectively), with no significant difference between groups. Contrasts comparing scores to baseline in each group were not significantly different, after adjustments with the Benjamini‐Hochberg method (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Respiratory clinical scores. Clinical scores of horses in the pellet group (white circles) and the soaked hay group (black circles) at week 0 (exacerbation) and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 weeks of treatment. Bars represent means ± SD. The dotted line represents normal values. Clinical scores decreased gradually over time in both groups (P = .0002 and <.0001 for soaked hay and pellets, respectively).

3.3. Pulmonary function

The ∆P L and E L were significantly different from baseline at all time points, in both groups. The R L was significantly different from baseline at all time points for the group fed soaked hay but was only different from baseline at week 4 for the group fed pellets (not significant after correction at week 6). There were no significant differences between the groups at each time point (Figure 2). At the end of the study, 4 out of 5 horses fed soaked hay had ∆P L ≤ 10 cm H2O, R L ≤ 1.0 cm H2O/L/s, and E L ≤ 1.0 cm H2O/L, while in the group fed pellets, only 1 horse was within normal ranges for all 3 parameters, and 2 others were in the normal range for elastance.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Pulmonary function. Change in transpleural pressure (∆P L), lung resistance (R L), and lung elastance (E L) for horses in the pellet group (white circles) and the soaked hay group (black circles) at week 0 (exacerbation) and after 2, 4, and 6 weeks of treatment. Bars represent mean ± SD. The shaded area represents normal values. *P < .01; **P < .001; ***P < .0001 (significantly different from baseline).

In the pellet‐fed group, a significant decrease in ∆P L and R L were observed after hyoscine butylbromide administration, indicating the presence of residual bronchoconstriction on week 6 in this group. In the soaked hay group, there were no significant changes and the only horse who showed a marked improvement in lung function after administration of the bronchodilator was the one with lung function data outside the reference ranges (Figure 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Residual bronchoconstriction. After 6 weeks of treatment, transpleural pressure (∆P L), pulmonary resistance (R L) and elastance (E L) were measured before and 10 minutes after hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan) administration. The shaded area represents the normal values. *P < .05 after vs. before hyoscine.

3.4. BALF cytology

At baseline, all horses had BALF neutrophils >10% and they showed a decrease in pulmonary neutrophilia over the study period. The pulmonary neutrophilia was higher in the pellet group compared with soaked hay group at baseline (mean difference [95% CI]: 31.1 [7.3, 54.9], P = .01), and decreased only in the pellet group over time (P = .001). The decrease in the soaked hay group (P = .04) was not significant after adjustment. At week 6, 1 and 3 horses belonging to the pellet‐fed group had BALF neutrophils below 5% and 10%, respectively, while in the soaked hay group, 2 and 5 horses had BALF neutrophils below 5% and 10%, respectively. There was no significant difference for mast cells, and eosinophils were absent from BALF (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cytology. Percentage of cells for horses in the pellet group (white circles) and the soaked hay group (black circles) at week 0 (exacerbation) and after 6 weeks of treatment. Eosinophils were absent from all BALF. The shaded area represents expected normal values. Bars represent mean ± SD. *P ≤ .01; **P < .001 (significantly different from baseline).

For macrophages and lymphocytes, the mean was significantly higher at week 6 compared with baseline in the pellet group (P = .005 and P = .009, respectively). The soaked hay group showed the same result only for lymphocytes (P = .01).

3.5. Mucus scores

The mucus score decreased gradually over time in the soaked hay group (P = .03) but not in the pellet group (P = .75; Figure 5).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Tracheal mucus. Mucus scores for horses in the pellet group (white circles) and the soaked hay group (black circles) at week 0 (exacerbation) and after 6 weeks of treatment. Bars represent the mean ± SD.

3.6. Body weight

In the soaked hay group, body weight decreased significantly between weeks 0 and 6 (P = .003), while there was no significant difference in the pellet group (Figure 6). The weight loss was 20.5 kg on average and ranged from 12 to 30 kg.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Weight. Body weight of horses in the pellet group (white circles) and the soaked hay group (black circles) at week 0 (exacerbation) and after 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Bars represent the mean ± SD.

4. DISCUSSION

4.1. Summary

In this study, soaked hay improved respiratory clinical scores, lung function, and tracheal mucus scores, but not pulmonary neutrophilia, while pellets improved clinical scores, lung function, and pulmonary neutrophilia.

4.2. Soaked hay improved clinical signs and lung function

The improvement in respiratory clinical scores is consistent with the decrease in cough, nasal discharge, and overall clinical improvement reported by owners of horses with asthma after soaking hay. 20 However, perceived poor response in some horses is also reported, 17 , 19 , 20 and this could contribute to a general impression of ineffectiveness, despite evidence of dust reduction with soaking. 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 Several elements could explain the relatively high efficacy of hay soaking in this study compared with the common perception. First, some owners will only briefly water down the hay, leaving much of a bale or flakes dry in the middle, 11 or will immerse the hay for a short period of time (<30 minutes). 10 It is also unlikely that dried out hay would be consistently discarded by owners. In addition to this, the improvement in clinical scores was observed only after 2 weeks, which could be longer than owners might be willing to wait before concluding whether a treatment is effective or not. Finally, all the horses in the study were fed a low‐dust diet of either soaked hay or pellets and were housed on wood shavings, which decreased the overall dust in the barn. Wood chip bedding decreases respirable dust in the breathing area 5 and in the ambient air, 7 , 28 and the combination of wood shavings and hay pellets reduces respirable particles in the breathing zone by up to 50%. 3 It was also shown that optimizing the management with soaked hay and wood shavings resulted not only in a significant reduction of respirable dust in the main stable, but also in an adjacent building with common airspace. 5

Thus, since all horses were subjected to a low‐dust diet and benefited from the low‐dust environment, the improvement in function and inflammation observed in both groups could be greater than achievable in practice. In a large stable, it would be difficult to feed all horses with soaked hay or other low‐dust diets just to accommodate a small number of asthmatic horses.

4.3. Lung inflammation decreased with pellets

Even if BALF neutrophilia decreased for all horses over the 6‐week period, the comparison of the effects of soaked hay and pellets on pulmonary neutrophilia was complicated by the fact that the neutrophilia was unexpectedly higher in the pellet group at baseline. Pulmonary neutrophilia is positively correlated with respirable dust in the horse's breathing zone 9 , 29 and is therefore expected to decrease with environmental avoidance strategies. The persistence of mild pulmonary neutrophilia in some horses in the soaked hay group could be explained by the transient increase in respirable particles that become airborne when the hay dries out. 30 This might not have played a major role in this study because of hay removal, but it could have an impact in barns with less stringent practices. In the pellet group, the 2 horses that had close to 20% neutrophils in their BALF at the end of the study were also amongst the 3 horses with the highest percentage at baseline. Pulmonary neutrophil percentage is usually positively correlated with mucus score 27 , 31 but here, the mucus scores decreased only in the soaked hay group. This could be in part due to the head position during feeding as horses in the soaked hay group were fed on the ground while those in the pellet group ate from a feeder. Keeping the head up for longer periods of time could have impaired the mucociliary system, which could lead to a decreased clearance of particles and debris in the trachea. 32

It should also be considered that the study duration might not have been sufficient to observe a normalization of pulmonary neutrophilia. In a study on an oiled mixed hay feeding system, pulmonary neutrophilia was significantly improved only after 2 months of treatment with either oiled mixed hay or pellets, 4 and it can take a few months of grazing to observe pulmonary neutrophils close to 5%. 12  Finally, the small number of horses combined with the relatively low BALF neutrophilia at baseline in the soaked hay group is likely to have affected our ability to detect a significant decrease in pulmonary neutrophilia in this group.

4.4. Limitations of hay soaking and practical considerations

Despite clinical improvement of horses in this study, it is important to remember that soaked hay increases the number of bacteria by 1.5 to 5 times for 10 minutes and 9 hours of soaking, respectively, suggesting rapid replication of bacteria from the time the hay is immersed in water and in the 2 hours after the hay soaking treatment. 10 , 22 , 33 This suggests an increase in exposure of horses to endotoxins that will either be ingested or be resuspended when the hay starts drying. This could lead to persistent neutrophilia as exposure to endotoxins results in a dose‐dependent increase in neutrophils in BALF. 6 , 11 , 21 Since soaking hay causes a rapid increase in bacteria, this requires rapid distribution after soaking and removal of leftovers between meals. Leftovers removal increased labor but the volume discarded was difficult to quantify since leftovers were often scattered in the stall and had variable residual humidity. Disposal of post‐soaking water effluent, which is an environmental pollutant 34 , 35 can also represent a challenge, especially when outdoor temperatures reach freezing point. All this requires personnel, adapted equipment (large and water‐resistant container) and time. Handling is also made more difficult by the added weight, that can reach 4 times its original weight after 20 minutes of soaking. 36

4.5. Weight loss in the soaked hay group

Soaking hay provides hygienic qualities but also has undesirable consequences such as loss of water‐soluble carbohydrates (WSC), minerals and crude proteins. The report decrease in WSC with soaking is highly variable: 2% to 4% after 12 hours, 34 34% on average after 9 hours, 10 and from 6% to 54% after 16 hours. 36 In this study the soaking time was relatively short but losses of minerals, crude proteins and WSC have been observed as early as 10 to 40 minutes following water immersion. 10 , 21 , 23 , 34 , 37 The changes in nutrient composition of hay not only decreases the caloric intake but can also alter the palatability and consumption of hay by changing its taste. 37 , 38 Horses seem to prefer steamed and dry hay over soaked hay. 37 In this study the feeding behavior was not recorded, and leftovers were not weighed so we cannot conclude on the main factor driving the weight loss. The weight loss was not considered problematic since all horses had body condition scores of at least 5/9, 39 but in addition to usual recommendations of providing minerals and vitamin supplements to horses fed soaked hay, careful monitoring of their weight should be implemented to avoid unexpected weight loss.

In conclusion, soaked hay improves clinical scores, lung function and mucus scores of horses with severe asthma. The strict protocol for soaking and discarding dried‐out hay in this study could however be considered too great of an inconvenience in some stables. In addition to this, feeding soaked hay or pellets could be less effective if only 1 or 2 horses are on a dust‐reduction program, since there would still be dust from handling dry hay for the other horses. This treatment however consists in an alternative for horses with asthma that do not have access to grass pasture and when other medical conditions or budget constraints limit the use of other alternatives such as pellets, haylage, silage, or oiled mixed hay.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

OFF‐LABEL ANTIMICROBIAL DECLARATION

Authors declare no off‐label use of antimicrobials.

INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE (IACUC) OR OTHER APPROVAL DECLARATION

All animal manipulations were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian council for Animal Care, and the protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Université de Montréal (19‐rech‐1995).

HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION

Authors declare human ethics approval was not needed for this study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Funding provided by the Equine Health Fund from the Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire of the Université de Montréal, supported by Zoetis, and the Fonds du Centenaire. The funding source did not have any involvement in the study design, data analysis, and interpretation, or writing and publication of the manuscript. The authors acknowledge Rebecca Di Pietro for language editing.

Westerfeld R, Payette F, Dubuc V, et al. Effects of soaked hay on lung function and airway inflammation in horses with severe asthma. J Vet Intern Med. 2024;38(1):469‐476. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16919

REFERENCES

  • 1. Couetil LL, Cardwell JM, Gerber V, et al. Inflammatory airway disease of horses—revised consensus statement. J Vet Intern Med. 2016;30:503‐515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Leclere M, Lavoie‐Lamoureux A, Lavoie JP. Heaves, an asthma‐like disease of horses. Respirology. 2011;16:1027‐1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Woods PS, Robinson NE, Swanson MC, et al. Airborne dust and aeroallergen concentration in a horse stable under two different management systems. Equine Vet J. 1993;25:208‐213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Jochmans‐Lemoine A, Picotte K, Beauchamp G, Vargas A, Lavoie JP. Effects of a propriety oiled mixed hay feeding system on lung function, neutrophilic airway inflammation and oxidative stress in severe asthmatic horses. Equine Vet J. 2020;52:564‐571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Clements JM, Pirie RS. Respirable dust concentrations in equine stables. Part 2: the benefits of soaking hay and optimising the environment in a neighbouring stable. Res Vet Sci. 2007;83:263‐268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Ivester KM, Couëtil LL. Management of chronic airway inflammation in the horse: a systematic review. Equine Vet Educ. 2014;26:647‐656. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. McGorum BC, Ellison J, Cullen RT. Total and respirable airborne dust endotoxin concentrations in three equine management systems. Equine Vet J. 1998;30:430‐434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pirie RS. Recurrent airway obstruction: a review. Equine Vet J. 2014;46:276‐288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ivester KM, Couetil LL, Zimmerman NJ. Investigating the link between particulate exposure and airway inflammation in the horse. J Vet Intern Med. 2014;28:1653‐1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Moore‐Colyer MJ, Lumbis K, Longland A, et al. The effect of five different wetting treatments on the nutrient content and microbial concentration in hay for horses. PloS One. 2014;9:e114079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pirie RS, Dixon PM, Collie DD, et al. Pulmonary and systemic effects of inhaled endotoxin in control and heaves horses. Equine Vet J. 2001;33:311‐318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Leclere M, Lavoie‐Lamoureux A, Joubert P, et al. Corticosteroids and antigen avoidance decrease airway smooth muscle mass in an equine asthma model. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;47:589‐596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Art T, McGorum BC, Lekeux P. Environmental control of respiratory disease. In: Lekeux P, ed. Equine Respiratory Diseases. Ithaca, New York: International Veterinary Information Service; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hothersall B, Nicol C. Role of diet and feeding in normal and stereotypic behaviors in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. 2009;25:167‐181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Olave CJ, Ivester KM, Couetil LL, Kritchevsky JE, Tinkler SH, Mukhopadhyay A. Dust exposure and pulmonary inflammation in Standardbred racehorses fed dry hay or haylage: a pilot study. Vet J. 2021;271:105654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Olave CJ, Ivester KM, Couetil LL, Burgess J, Park JH, Mukhopadhyay A. Effects of low‐dust forages on dust exposure, airway cytology, and plasma omega‐3 concentrations in thoroughbred racehorses: a randomized clinical trial. J Vet Intern Med. 2022;37:338‐348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Boivin R, Pilon F, Lavoie JP, Leclere M. Adherence to treatment recommendations and short‐term outcome of pleasure and sport horses with equine asthma. Can Vet J. 2018;59:1293‐1298. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dixon PM, Railton DI, McGorum BC. Equine pulmonary disease: a case control study of 300 referred cases. Part 2: details of animals and of historical and clinical findings. Equine Vet J. 1995;27:422‐427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hotchkiss JW, Reid SW, Christley RM. A survey of horse owners in Great Britain regarding horses in their care. Part 1: horse demographic characteristics and management. Equine Vet J. 2007;39:294‐300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Simoes J, Sales Luis JP, Tilley P. Owner compliance to an environmental management protocol for severe equine asthma syndrome. J Equine Vet. 2020;87:102937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Blackman M, Moore‐Colyer MJS. Hay for horses: the effects of three different wetting treatments on dust and nutrient content. Anim Sci. 2010;66:745‐750. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Moore‐Colyer MJS, Taylor JLE, James R. The effect of steaming and soaking on the respirable particle, bacteria, mould, and nutrient content in Hay for horses. J Equine Vet. 2016;39:62‐68. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Moore‐Colyer MJS. Effects of soaking hay fodder for horses on dust and mineral content. Anim Sci. 2010;63:337‐342. [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Whittaker AG, Hughes KJ, Parkin TD, et al. Concentrations of dust and endotoxin in equine stabling. Vet Rec. 2009;165:293‐295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Robinson NE, Olszewski MA, Boehler D, et al. Relationship between clinical signs and lung function in horses with recurrent airway obstruction (heaves) during a bronchodilator trial. Equine Vet J. 2000;32:393‐400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Rush BR, Raub ES, Rhoads WS, et al. Pulmonary function in horses with recurrent airway obstruction after aerosol and parenteral administration of beclomethasone dipropionate and dexamethasone, respectively. Am J Vet Res. 1998;59:1039‐1043. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Gerber V, Straub R, Marti E, et al. Endoscopic scoring of mucus quantity and quality: observer and horse variance and relationship to inflammation, mucus viscoelasticity and volume. Equine Vet J. 2004;36:576‐582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Fleming K, Hessel EF, van den Weghe HFA. Generation of airborne particles from different bedding materials used for horse keeping. J Equine Vet. 2008;28:408‐418. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ivester KM, Couetil LL, Moore GE. An observational study of environmental exposures, airway cytology, and performance in racing thoroughbreds. J Vet Intern Med. 2018;32:1754‐1762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Robinson NE, Jackson CA, Peroni D, Gerber V. Management of heaves. Equine Vet Educ. 2001;13:247‐259. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Koblinger K, Nicol J, McDonald K, et al. Endoscopic assessment of airway inflammation in horses. J Vet Intern Med. 2011;25:1118‐1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Raidal SL, Love DN, Bailey GD. Effects of posture and accumulated airway secretions on tracheal mucociliary transport in the horse. Aust Vet J. 1996;73:45‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Moore‐Colyer MJS, Fillery BG. The effect of three different treatments on the respirable particle content, total viable count and mould concentrations in hay for horses. In: Saastamoinen M, Fradinho MJ, Santos AS, Miraglia N, eds. Forages and Grazing in Horse Nutrition. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2012:101‐106. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Warr EM, Petch JL. Effects of soaking hay on its nutritional quality. Equine Vet Educ. 1992;5:169‐171. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Blundell EL, Adjei LJ, Brigden CV. The effect of steaming and soaking treatments on respirable dust content of hay and the potential environmental polluting impact of the waste water produced. In: Saastamoinen M, Fradinho MJ, Santos AS, Miraglia N, eds. Forages and Grazing in Horse Nutrition. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2012:125‐128. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Longland AC, Barfoot C, Harris PA. Effects of soaking on the water‐soluble carbohydrate and crude protein content of hay. Vet Rec. 2011;168:618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Owens TG, Barnes M, Gargano VM, et al. Nutrient content changes from steaming or soaking timothy‐alfalfa hay: effects on feed preferences and acute glycemic response in standardbred racehorses1. J Anim Sci. 2019;97:4199‐4207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Merkies K, Bogart E. Discrimination of sour and sweet solutions by mature horses. J Equine Vet. 2013;33:330‐331. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, et al. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares. Equine Vet J. 1983;15:371‐372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES