Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 18;9(1):14. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9010014

Table 3.

Prevalence of frailty, its components, and capability of performing handgrip strength measurement by sex and age. Subgroups of women and participants aged 94–99 years served as comparators in statistical analyses.

All
(n = 289)
Women
(n = 225)
Men
(n = 64)
94–99 yrs
(n = 202)
≥100 yrs
(n = 87)
Frailty status
Robust [n (%)] 21 (7.3) 10 (4.4) 11 (17.2) 19 (9.4) 2 (2.3)
Prefrail [n (%)] 96 (33.2) 66 (29.3) 30 (46.9) 71 (35.2) 25 (28.7)
Frail [n (%)] 172 (59.5) 149 (66.3) 23 (35.9) 112 (55.4) 60 (69.0)
Frailty criteria
Weight loss [n (%)] 17 (5.9) 15 (6.7) 2 (3.1) 13 (6.4) 4 (4.6)
Low physical activity [n (%)] 200 (69.2) 172 (76.4) 28 (43.8) *** 133 (65.8) 67 (77.0)
Slow walking speed [n (%)] 204 (70.6) 162 (72.0) 42 (65.6) 137 (67.8) 67 (77.0)
Fatigue [n (%)] 68 (23.5) 62 (27.6) 6 (9.4) ** 43 (21.3) 25 (28.7)
Weakness [n (%)] 246 (85.4) 203 (90.6) 43 (67.2) *** 166 (82.2) 80 (93.0) *
Handgrip strength measurement
Performed [n (%)] 244 (84.4) 186 (82.7) 58 (90.6) 182 (90.1) 62 (71.3) ***
Not performed [n (%)] 45 (15.6) 39 (17.3) 6 (9.4) 20 (9.9) 25 (28.7) ***

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.