Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 11;9(1):20. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010020

Table 5.

Effects of SMR on speed.

Study n Measurement Results
Group M SD p
Barrenetxea-García, 2023 [55] 30 20 m sprint swim test (seconds) CG 12.23 0.75 p > 0.05
FR 12.17 0.89
Wang, 2022 [59] 27 2.5 m lateral acceleration test left (seconds) VFR 0.94 0.098 p > 0.05
Percussion devices 1.004 0.138
CG 0.951 0.09
2.5 m lateral acceleration test (seconds) VFR 0.896 0.1
Percussion devices 0.967 0.107
CG 0.954 0.122
Lopez Samanes, 2021 [61] 11 10 m sprints (seconds) DS pre 2.22 0.11 p > 0.05
DS post 2.2 0.12
SMR pre 2.12 0.08
SMR post 2.14 0.08
Rahimi, 2020 [62] 17 Repeated sprint ability (m) Passive pre 740.8 52.3 p > 0.05
Passive post 727.6 65.3
FR pre 723.5 41.9
FR post 689.6 40.8
Stroiney, 2018 [68] Sprint time—Men (seconds) SMR pre 5.4 0.47 p > 0.05
SMR post 5.47 0.52
Assisted soft tissue mobilisation, pre 5.1 0.42
Assisted soft tissue mobilisation, post 5.34 0.43
Sprint time—Women (seconds) SMR pre 5.7 0.27
SMR post 6.06 0.5
Assisted soft tissue mobilisation, pre 5.8 0.49
Assisted soft tissue mobilisation, post 5.94 0.47
Giovanelli, 2018 [67] 13 Running energy cost CG pre vs. post Not specified
FR pre vs. post +6.2% 8.3 p = 0.052
D’Amico, 2017 [71] 16 Running time (seconds) Active recovery 146.9 2.2 p < 0.05 *
SMR 145.2 1.8
Rey, 2017 [73] 18 5 m sprints (seconds) CG pre 0.98 0.03 p > 0.05
CG post 1 0.05
FR pre 0.98 0.06
FR post 1 0.06
10 m sprints (seconds) CG pre 1.68 0.07 p > 0.05
CG post 1.71 0.07
FR pre 1.71 0.09
FR post 1.72 0.05
Peacock, 2014 [78] 11 37 m sprints (seconds) DYN 5.11 0.29 p = 0.002 *
SMR + DYN 4.95 0.21

CG = control group; DS = dynamic stretching; DYN = dynamic warm-up; FR = foam roller; M = mean; p ≤ 0.05 or * = significant; post = post-intervention; pre = pre-intervention; SD = standard deviation; SMR = self-myofascial release; VFR = vibration foam roller.