Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 11;9(1):20. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9010020

Table 6.

Effects of SMR on athletes’ agility.

Study n Measurement Results
Group M SD p
Wang, 2022 [59] 27 Hexagon test (seconds) VFR 10.73 0.4 p = 0.03 *
Percussion devices 11.02 0.45
CG 11.39 0.73
Chen, 2021 [60] 15 Frequency speed of kick test GW 105.1 7.7 p = 0.33
GW + VFR 109.5 9.9
Hexagon test (seconds) GW 12.8 1.6 p = 0.03 *
GW + VFR 11.6 1
5-0-5 test (seconds) GW 2.6 0.2 p = 0.37
GW + VFR 2.6 0.2
Lopez Samanes, 2021 [61] 11 5-0-5 test (seconds) DS pre 2.86 0.14 p > 0.05
DS post 2.79 0.13
SMR pre 2.75 0.18
SMR post 2.76 0.13
Rahimi, 2020 [62] 17 Pro-agility 5-10-5 test (seconds) Passive pre 5.2 0.3 p > 0.05
Passive post 5.4 0.3
FR pre 5.1 0.3
FR post 5.2 0.3
Richman, 2018 [69] 14 Short sprint (seconds) Light walk + DS 2.05 0.17 p = 0.222
FR + DS 2.02 0.13
t-test (seconds) Light walk + DS 12.22 0.77 p = 0.577
FR + DS 12.18 0.08
Rey, 2017 [73] 18 t-test (seconds) CG pre 9.22 0.21 p between groups < 0.05 *
CG post 9.48 0.27
FR pre 9.34 0.31
FR post 9.36 0.34
Peacock, 2014 [78] 11 Pro-agility 18.3 m (seconds) DYN 4.97 0.24 p = 0.001 *
SMR + DYN 4.8 0.16

CG = control group; DS = dynamic stretching; DYN = dynamic warm-up; FR = foam roller; GW = general warm-up; m = metres; M = mean; p ≤ 0.05 or * = significant; post = post-intervention; pre = pre-intervention; SD = standard deviation; SMR = self-myofascial release; VFR = vibration foam roller.